Literature DB >> 21440737

Steroid and calcineurin inhibitor-sparing protocols in kidney transplantation.

I Helal1, L Chan.   

Abstract

Recent improvements in kidney transplantation have been driven largely by lower acute rejection rates attributed to better immunosuppressive agents. In an effort to reduce the long-term toxicities of immunosuppressant drugs, corticosteroid- and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-sparing immunosuppression protocols have become increasingly popular in managing kidney transplant recipients. Nevertheless, these strategies may increase the risk of acute and chronic allograft injury (CAI) that may worsen the fate of transplant recipients. This article focuses on steroid and CNI sparing protocols to elucidate their safety and efficacy in patients receiving a kidney transplant. Steroid avoidance protocols are rapidly and increasingly being used. Studies have shown that corticosteroids are not essential to achieve excellent short- and intermediate-term results. However, the role of steroid withdrawal is only marginally beneficial and very often benefit overstated. CNI-sparing strategies have been used to help maintain the balance between allograft survival and nephrotoxicity. Trials evaluating CNI minimization have shown reduced incidence of CAI and preservation of allograft function. CNI withdrawal within 3 to 12 months after kidney transplantation improved graft function despite increased risk of acute rejection. This approach may be feasible with adequate exposure and proper usage of mammalian target of rapamacin inhibitors. Late withdrawal or conversion did not show a clear benefit. Timing and degree of renal dysfunction are key determining factors. With regards to CNI avoidance, earlier trials, such as the Symphony study, did not support the use of a CNI-free regimen of low-dose sirolimus as initial immunosuppression. However, recent studies using costimulatory blockade-based immusouppression showed that CNI avoidance is possible. The best maintenance immunosuppressive with CNI- or steroid-sparing is a work in progress and awaits longer term follow-up. The availability of newer biologics for costimulatory blockade and new immunosuppressive agents with novel mechanisms of action have the potential of using CNI- and steroid-sparing protocols to minimize the incidence of CAI and improve long-term outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21440737     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  9 in total

Review 1.  Is it time to give up with calcineurin inhibitors in kidney transplantation?

Authors:  Maurizio Salvadori; Elisabetta Bertoni
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2013-06-24

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prednisolone and prednisone in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Troels K Bergmann; Katherine A Barraclough; Katie J Lee; Christine E Staatz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Improved Tacrolimus Target Concentration Achievement Using Computerized Dosing in Renal Transplant Recipients--A Prospective, Randomized Study.

Authors:  Elisabet Størset; Anders Åsberg; Morten Skauby; Michael Neely; Stein Bergan; Sara Bremer; Karsten Midtvedt
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Alternatively activated macrophages in the pathogenesis of chronic kidney allograft injury.

Authors:  Yohei Ikezumi; Toshiaki Suzuki; Takeshi Yamada; Hiroya Hasegawa; Utako Kaneko; Masanori Hara; Toshio Yanagihara; David J Nikolic-Paterson; Akihiko Saitoh
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 5.  Calcineurin inhibitor sparing strategies in renal transplantation, part one: Late sparing strategies.

Authors:  Andrew Scott Mathis; Gwen Egloff; Hoytin Lee Ghin
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-24

6.  Cyclosporine: a review.

Authors:  Dustin Tedesco; Lukas Haragsim
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2012-01-04

7.  Infectious risks and optimal strength of maintenance immunosuppressants in rituximab-treated kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Chung Hee Baek; Won Seok Yang; Kyung Sun Park; Duck Jong Han; Jae Berm Park; Su-Kil Park
Journal:  Nephron Extra       Date:  2012-03-28

8.  Cellular and molecular immune profiles in renal transplant recipients after conversion from tacrolimus to sirolimus.

Authors:  Lorenzo Gallon; Opas Traitanon; Nedjema Sustento-Reodica; Joseph Leventhal; M Javeed Ansari; Ricardo C Gehrau; Venkatesh Ariyamuthu; Sacha A De Serres; Antonio Alvarado; Darshika Chhabra; James M Mathew; Nader Najafian; Valeria Mas
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Thymoglobulin Versus Alemtuzumab Versus Basiliximab Kidney Transplantation From Donors After Circulatory Death.

Authors:  Argiris Asderakis; Tarique K Sabah; William J Watkins; Usman Khalid; Laszlo Szabo; Michael R Stephens; Sian Griffin; Rafael Chavez
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2022-01-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.