Literature DB >> 21440363

Outcome measures for traumatic brain injury.

Dhaval Shukla1, B Indira Devi, Amit Agrawal.   

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major public health problem resulting in death and disabilities of young and productive people. Though the mortality of TBI has decreased substantially in recent years the disability due to TBI has not appreciably reduced. Various outcome scales have been proposed and used to assess disability after TBI. A few, commonly used are Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) with or without extended scores, Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ), and the Functional Status Examination (FSE). These scales assess disability resulting from physical and cognitive impairments. For patients with good physical recovery a cognitive and neuropsychological outcome measure is required. Such measures include Neurobehavioural Function Inventory and specific neuropsychological tests like Rey Complex Figure for visuoconstruction and memory, Controlled Oral Word Association for verbal fluency, Symbol Digit Modalities (verbal) for sustained attention and Grooved Pegboard for fine motor dexterity. A more holistic and complete outcome measure is Quality of Life (QOL). Disease specific QOL measure for TBI, Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) has also been recently proposed. The problems with outcome measures include poor operational definitions, lack of sensitivity or low ceiling effects, inability to evaluate patients who cannot report, lack of integration of morbidity and mortality categories, and limited domains of functioning assessed. GOSE-E satisfies most of the criteria of good outcome scale and in combination with neuropsychological tests is a near complete instrument for assessment of outcome after TBI.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21440363     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  52 in total

1.  An updated Italian normative dataset for the Stroop color word test (SCWT).

Authors:  A Brugnolo; F De Carli; J Accardo; M Amore; L E Bosia; C Bruzzaniti; S F Cappa; L Cocito; G Colazzo; M Ferrara; L Ghio; E Magi; G L Mancardi; F Nobili; M Pardini; R Rissotto; C Serrati; N Girtler
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  ED disposition of the Glasgow Coma Scale 13 to 15 traumatic brain injury patient: analysis of the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI study.

Authors:  Jonathan J Ratcliff; Opeolu Adeoye; Christopher J Lindsell; Kimberly W Hart; Arthur Pancioli; Jason T McMullan; John K Yue; Daniel K Nishijima; Wayne A Gordon; Alex B Valadka; David O Okonkwo; Hester F Lingsma; Andrew I R Maas; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Inflammatory consequences in a rodent model of mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  J Regino Perez-Polo; Harriet C Rea; Kathia M Johnson; Margaret A Parsley; Geda C Unabia; Guojing Xu; Smitha K Infante; Douglas S Dewitt; Claire E Hulsebosch
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  A Comparison of Satisfaction With Life and the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended After Traumatic Brain Injury: An Analysis of the TRACK-TBI Pilot Study.

Authors:  Natalie P Kreitzer; Kimberly Hart; Christopher J Lindsell; Geoffrey T Manley; Sureyya S Dikmen; Jonathan J Ratcliff; John K Yue; Opeolu M Adeoye
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.710

5.  Longitudinal description of the glasgow outcome scale-extended for individuals in the traumatic brain injury model systems national database: a National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research traumatic brain injury model systems study.

Authors:  Christopher R Pretz; Kristen Dams-O'Connor
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Global Outcome Trajectories After TBI Among Survivors and Nonsurvivors: A National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study.

Authors:  Kristen Dams-OʼConnor; Christopher Pretz; Tausif Billah; Flora M Hammond; Cynthia Harrison-Felix
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.710

7.  Symptomatology and functional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: results from the prospective TRACK-TBI study.

Authors:  Paul McMahon; Allison Hricik; John K Yue; Ava M Puccio; Tomoo Inoue; Hester F Lingsma; Sue R Beers; Wayne A Gordon; Alex B Valadka; Geoffrey T Manley; David O Okonkwo
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Effects of Red Blood Cell Transfusion on Long-Term Disability of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Santiago R Leal-Noval; Ángela Muñoz-Serrano; Victoria Arellano-Orden; Aurelio Cayuela; Manuel Muñoz-Gómez; Antonio Recio; Antonio Alcántara; Rosario Amaya-Villar; Manuel Casado-Méndez; Francisco Murillo-Cabezas
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  Mortality Secondary to Unintentional Poisoning after Inpatient Rehabilitation among Individuals with Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Flora M Hammond; Jessica Ketchum; Kristen Dams-O'Connor; John D Corrigan; Cate Miller; Juliet Haarbauer-Krupa; Mark Faul; Lance E Trexler; Cynthia Harrison-Felix
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging improves 3-month outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Esther L Yuh; Pratik Mukherjee; Hester F Lingsma; John K Yue; Adam R Ferguson; Wayne A Gordon; Alex B Valadka; David M Schnyer; David O Okonkwo; Andrew I R Maas; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 10.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.