Literature DB >> 21440272

Understanding novice driver policy agenda setting.

R Hinchcliff1, R Poulos, R Q Ivers, T Senserrick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the acute impact of road trauma involving novice drivers, there have been few efforts to identify the main factors influencing the novice driver policy agenda. Increasing the transparency of such policy dynamics may help inform future novice driver policy agenda-setting processes, as well as those in other public health settings.
METHODS: Forty interviews were conducted between 2007 and 2009 with individuals involved in novice driver policy debates and processes in four Australian states.
RESULTS: An increasing body of positive evaluations from other jurisdictions was seen to provide an initial stimulus for Australian novice driver policy activities. The dissemination of evidence by researchers, lobbying and advocacy by other influential stakeholders, and media reporting of multiple-fatality novice driver crashes were seen as other factors central to policy agenda setting.
CONCLUSIONS: Australian graduated driver licensing (GDL) policy initiatives may only be acted upon once adequate political support is identified in terms of community demand for action and public acceptance of GDL policy in neighboring states. As such, researcher encouragement of community support for unpopular evidence-based policies during windows of opportunity for policy reform may act as an influential agenda-setting force.
Copyright © 2011 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21440272     DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  3 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers.

Authors:  Kathryn Oliver; Simon Innvar; Theo Lorenc; Jenny Woodman; James Thomas
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Stakeholder perspectives on implementing accreditation programs: a qualitative study of enabling factors.

Authors:  Reece Hinchcliff; David Greenfield; Johanna I Westbrook; Marjorie Pawsey; Virginia Mumford; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Evaluation of current Australian health service accreditation processes (ACCREDIT-CAP): protocol for a mixed-method research project.

Authors:  Reece Hinchcliff; David Greenfield; Max Moldovan; Marjorie Pawsey; Virginia Mumford; Johanna Irene Westbrook; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.