Literature DB >> 21440096

Relationships of age, cholecystectomy approach and timing with the surgical and functional outcomes of elderly patients with cholecystitis.

Kazuaki Kuwabara1, Shinya Matsuda, Kiyohide Fushimi, Koichi B Ishikawa, Hiromasa Horiguchi, Kenji Fujimori.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Safety confirmation has led to calls for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to prevail in elderly patients, but the functional changes after LC have not been sufficiently compared with open cholecystectomy (OC). Using an administrative database, we reassessed the quality of cholecystectomy approach and timing of cholecystectomy for elderly patients with cholecystitis.
METHODS: A total of 2552 patients aged ≥60 years who underwent cholecystectomy for cholecystitis were enrolled. Variables included demographics, comorbidities, complications, preoperative bile duct scrutiny, cholecystectomy timing (<48, 48-96, >96 h), functional status estimated by the Barthel index, teaching status, postoperative length of stay (LOS) and total charges (TC). The impacts of age, OC and timing on LOS, TC, complications and functional changes were assessed by mixed linear regression analyses using propensity score-matched cohorts for LC and OC.
RESULTS: The patients comprised 1742 LC and 810 OC patients across 122 hospitals. The mean ages and octogenarian proportions were 70.1 years and 10.6% for LC and 72.9 years and 20.5% for OC. Advancing age, males and acute inflammation were more frequently associated with OC. Longer LOS, higher TC and more complications were observed for OC. Age was a predictor of functional changes but not complications. Octogenarians and complications were associated with longer LOS, higher TC and more functional deterioration. Earlier cholecystectomy was only associated with lower TC.
CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians were likely to have OC and functional deterioration. Since OC was a predictor of resource use and complications, strategies to complete earlier LC and prevent complications are required for octogenarians.
Copyright © 2011 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21440096     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  5 in total

1.  Cholecystectomy for the elderly: no hesitation for otherwise healthy patients.

Authors:  Liv Bjerre Juul Nielsen; Kirstine Moll Harboe; Linda Bardram
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Time trend and variability of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstone disease.

Authors:  Mario Saia; Domenico Mantoan; Alessandra Buja; Chiara Bertoncello; Tatjana Baldovin; Giampietro Callegaro; Vincenzo Baldo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Geriatric Assessment as a qualification element for elective and emergency cholecystectomy in older patients.

Authors:  Jakub Kenig; Piotr Wałęga; Urszula Olszewska; Aleksander Konturek; Wojciech Nowak
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Predictive Factors for Drain Placement After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Giacomo Calini; Pier Paolo Brollo; Rosanna Quattrin; Vittorio Bresadola
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-02

5.  Outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in octogenarians.

Authors:  Rafael S Marcari; Renato Micelli Lupinacci; Luis Roberto Nadal; Ronaldo E Rego; Andrea M Coelho; José Francisco de Matos Farah
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.