Literature DB >> 21439617

Effect of urologists and medical oncologists on treatment of elderly men with Stage IV prostate cancer.

Eberechukwu Onukwugha1, C Daniel Mullins, Van Doren Hsu, Brian Seal, Arif Hussain.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine, among elderly men with incident advanced prostate cancer (PCa), their treatment, in general, and chemotherapy, in particular, in association with a posturologist medical oncologist/hematologist (PUMOH) visit. The role of specialists in the management of advanced PCa is evolving in response to positive chemotherapy trials of PCa.
METHODS: Linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End results and Medicare data included patients with Stage IV PCa diagnosed from 1994 to 2002 who had visited a urologist after the diagnosis and received treatment. The visits and treatment were examined, comparing patients with and without PUMOH visits.
RESULTS: Most (77%) patients received treatment of their PCa and 85% of treated patients had a subsequent visit with a urologist, of whom 91% saw the urologist first (n = 5435). Of these, 43% saw only the urologist, 41% saw a medical oncologist/hematologist, and 32% saw a radiation oncologist. Of the 5435 patients, 16% received chemotherapy and the adjusted odds of chemotherapy receipt were 7.2 times greater (95% confidence interval 6.0-8.7, P < .001) among those with a PUMOH visit. Compared with non-Hispanic whites, black Americans were less likely (adjusted odds ratio 0.53, P < .001) to receive chemotherapy, although the likelihood of a PUMOH visit was similar (adjusted odds ratio 0.86, P = .14) among the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that nearly one quarter of men with Stage IV PCa receive no PCa treatment. Although a PUMOH visit is a significant predictor of chemotherapy receipt, many men with advanced PCa received chemotherapy without a medical oncologist/hematologist visit. Black American and elderly men were less likely to receive chemotherapy for advanced PCa.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21439617     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.11.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  A systematic scoping review of multidisciplinary cancer team and decision-making in the management of men with advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Holmes; B D Kelly; M Perera; R S Eapen; D M Bolton; N Lawrentschuk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Sensitivity of Medicare Data to Identify Oncologists.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Michael J Barrett; Dolly P White; Robert Banks; Susannah Cafardi; Lindsey Enewold
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-05-01

3.  Long-term outcomes of combined androgen blockade therapy in stage IV prostate cancer.

Authors:  Taeko Matsuoka; Koji Kawai; Tomokazu Kimura; Takahiro Kojima; Mizuki Onozawa; Jun Miyazaki; Hiroyuki Nishiyama; Shiro Hinotsu; Hideyuki Akaza
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  The Use of Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) and Chemotherapeutic Agents in New Zealand Men with Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ross Lawrenson; Zuzana Obertová; Charis Brown; Peter Fong; Leanne Tyrie; Nina Scott; Michael Holmes
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  Variation in geographic access to chemotherapy by definitions of providers and service locations: a population-based observational study.

Authors:  Mary C Schroeder; Cole G Chapman; Matthew C Nattinger; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Taher Abu-Hejleh; Yu-Yu Tien; John M Brooks
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.