Literature DB >> 21439608

Sulfate threshold target to control methylmercury levels in wetland ecosystems.

Juliana Corrales1, Ghinwa M Naja, Catherine Dziuba, Rosanna G Rivero, William Orem.   

Abstract

Sulfate contamination has a significant environmental implication through the stimulation of toxic hydrogen sulfide and methylmercury (MeHg) production. High levels of MeHg are a serious problem in many wetland ecosystems worldwide. In the Florida Everglades, it has been demonstrated that increasing MeHg occurrence is due to a sulfate contamination problem. A promising strategy of lowering the MeHg occurrence is to reduce the amount of sulfate entering the ecosystem. High surface water sulfate concentrations in the Everglades are mainly due to discharges from the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) canals. Water and total sulfur mass balances indicated that total sulfur released by soil oxidation, Lake Okeechobee and agricultural application were the major sources contributing 49,169, 35,217 and 11,775mtonsyear(-1), respectively. Total sulfur loads from groundwater, levees, and atmospheric deposition contributed to a lesser extent: 4055; 5858 and 4229mtonsyear(-1), respectively. Total sulfur leaving the EAA into Water Conservation Areas (WCAs) through canal discharge was estimated at 116,360mtonsyear(-1), and total sulfur removed by sugarcane harvest accounted for 23,182mtonsyear(-1). Furthermore, a rise in the mineral content and pH of the EAA soil over time, suggested that the current rates of sulfur application would increase as the buffer capacity of the soil increases. Therefore, a site specific numeric criterion for sulfate of 1mgL(-1) was recommended for the protection of the Everglades; above this level, mercury methylation is enhanced. In parallel, sulfide concentrations in the EAA exceeded the 2μgL(-1) criterion for surface water already established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21439608     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Projecting changes in Everglades soil biogeochemistry for carbon and other key elements, to possible 2060 climate and hydrologic scenarios.

Authors:  William Orem; Susan Newman; Todd Z Osborne; K Ramesh Reddy
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Response to Julian et al. (2015) "comment on and reinterpretation of Gabriel et al. (2014) 'fish mercury and surface water sulfate relationships in the everglades protection area'".

Authors:  Mark C Gabriel; Don Axelrad; William Orem; Todd Z Osborne
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Mercury accumulation in largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides Lacépède) within marsh ecosystems of the Florida Everglades, USA.

Authors:  Paul Julian; Binhe Gu
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Comment on and reinterpretation of Gabriel et Al. (2014) 'fish mercury and surface water sulfate relationships in the everglades protection area'.

Authors:  Paul Julian; Binhe Gu; Garth Redfield
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Fish mercury and surface water sulfate relationships in the Everglades Protection Area.

Authors:  Mark C Gabriel; Nicole Howard; Todd Z Osborne
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.266

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.