Literature DB >> 21439379

A comparative study of the physicochemical properties of iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer), a new intravenous iron preparation and its clinical implications.

Markus R Jahn1, Hans B Andreasen, Sören Fütterer, Thomas Nawroth, Volker Schünemann, Ute Kolb, Wolfgang Hofmeister, Manuel Muñoz, Klaus Bock, Morten Meldal, Peter Langguth.   

Abstract

The treatment of iron deficiency anemia with polynuclear iron formulations is an established therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease but also in other disease areas like gastroenterology, cardiology, oncology, pre/post operatively and obstetrics' and gynecology. Parenteral iron formulations represent colloidal systems in the lower nanometer size range which have traditionally been shown to consist of an iron core surrounded by a carbohydrate shell. In this publication, we for the first time describe the novel matrix structure of iron isomaltoside 1000 which differs from the traditional picture of an iron core surrounded by a carbohydrate. Despite some structural similarities between the different iron formulations, the products differ significantly in their physicochemical properties such as particle size, zeta potential, free and labile iron content, and release of iron in serum. This study compares the physiochemical properties of iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer) with the currently available intravenous iron preparations and relates them to their biopharmaceutical properties and their approved clinical applications. The investigated products encompass low molecular weight iron dextran (CosmoFer), sodium ferric gluconate (Ferrlecit), iron sucrose (Venofer), iron carboxymaltose (Ferinject/Injectafer), and ferumoxytol (Feraheme) which are compared to iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer). It is shown that significant and clinically relevant differences exist between sodium ferric gluconate and iron sucrose as labile iron formulations and iron dextran, iron carboxymaltose, ferumoxytol, and iron isomaltoside 1000 as stable polynuclear formulations. The differences exist in terms of their immunogenic potential, safety, and convenience of use, the latter being expressed by the opportunity for high single-dose administration and short infusion times. Monofer is a new parenteral iron product with a very low immunogenic potential and a very low content of labile and free iron. This enables Monofer, as the only IV iron formulation, to be administered as a rapid high dose infusion in doses exceeding 1000 mg without the application of a test dose. This offers considerable dose flexibility, including the possibility of providing full iron repletion in a single infusion (one-dose iron repletion).
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21439379     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2011.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm        ISSN: 0939-6411            Impact factor:   5.571


  82 in total

Review 1.  On the role of iron therapy for reducing allogeneic blood transfusion in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Manuel Muñoz; José Antonio García-Erce; Jorge Cuenca; Elvira Bisbe; Enrique Naveira
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Iron-deficiency anaemia in the Emergency Room: a new opportunity for the use of intravenous iron.

Authors:  Dan Morhaim; Michael Auerbach
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Evaluating plasma pharmacokinetics of intravenous iron formulations: judging books by their covers?

Authors:  Amy Barton Pai
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Considerations and challenges in defining optimal iron utilization in hemodialysis.

Authors:  David M Charytan; Amy Barton Pai; Christopher T Chan; Daniel W Coyne; Adriana M Hung; Csaba P Kovesdy; Steven Fishbane
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 5.  Scientific and Regulatory Considerations for Generic Complex Drug Products Containing Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Nan Zheng; Dajun D Sun; Peng Zou; Wenlei Jiang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 6.  The Labile Side of Iron Supplementation in CKD.

Authors:  Itzchak Slotki; Zvi Ioav Cabantchik
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 7.  Current management of iron deficiency anemia in inflammatory bowel diseases: a practical guide.

Authors:  Fernando Gomollón; Javier P Gisbert
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Safety of intravenous iron formulations: facts and folklore.

Authors:  Michael Auerbach; Iain C Macdougall
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.443

9.  On both sides of the ocean.

Authors:  Kristine Jimenez; Christoph Gasche; Michael Auerbach
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.443

10.  Heat-induced radiolabeling and fluorescence labeling of Feraheme nanoparticles for PET/SPECT imaging and flow cytometry.

Authors:  Hushan Yuan; Moses Q Wilks; Marc D Normandin; Georges El Fakhri; Charalambos Kaittanis; Lee Josephson
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 13.491

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.