BACKGROUND: Effective communication is considered to be essential for the delivery of high-quality care. Communication in palliative care may be particularly difficult, and there is still no accepted set of communication skills for GPs in providing palliative care. AIM: To obtain detailed information on facilitators and barriers for GP-patient communication in palliative care, with the aim to develop training programmes that enable GPs to improve their palliative care communication skills. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative study with focus groups, interviews, and questionnaires. SETTING: GPs with patients receiving palliative care at home, and end-of-life consultants in the Netherlands. METHOD: GP (n = 20) focus groups discussing facilitators and barriers, palliative care patient (n = 6) interviews regarding facilitators, and end-of-life consultant (n = 22) questionnaires concerning barriers. RESULTS: Facilitators reported by both GPs and patients were accessibility, taking time, commitment, and listening carefully. GPs emphasise respect, while patients want GPs to behave in a friendly way, and to take the initiative to discuss end-of-life issues. Barriers reported by both GPs and end-of-life consultants were: difficulty in dealing with former doctors' delay and strong demands from patients' relatives. GPs report difficulty in dealing with strong emotions and troublesome doctor-patient relationships, while consultants report insufficient clarification of patients' problems, promises that could not be kept, helplessness, too close involvement, and insufficient anticipation of various scenarios. CONCLUSION: The study findings suggest that the quality of GP-patient communication in palliative care in the Netherlands can be improved. It is recommended that specific communication training programmes for GPs should be developed and evaluated.
BACKGROUND: Effective communication is considered to be essential for the delivery of high-quality care. Communication in palliative care may be particularly difficult, and there is still no accepted set of communication skills for GPs in providing palliative care. AIM: To obtain detailed information on facilitators and barriers for GP-patient communication in palliative care, with the aim to develop training programmes that enable GPs to improve their palliative care communication skills. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative study with focus groups, interviews, and questionnaires. SETTING: GPs with patients receiving palliative care at home, and end-of-life consultants in the Netherlands. METHOD: GP (n = 20) focus groups discussing facilitators and barriers, palliative care patient (n = 6) interviews regarding facilitators, and end-of-life consultant (n = 22) questionnaires concerning barriers. RESULTS: Facilitators reported by both GPs and patients were accessibility, taking time, commitment, and listening carefully. GPs emphasise respect, while patients want GPs to behave in a friendly way, and to take the initiative to discuss end-of-life issues. Barriers reported by both GPs and end-of-life consultants were: difficulty in dealing with former doctors' delay and strong demands from patients' relatives. GPs report difficulty in dealing with strong emotions and troublesome doctor-patient relationships, while consultants report insufficient clarification of patients' problems, promises that could not be kept, helplessness, too close involvement, and insufficient anticipation of various scenarios. CONCLUSION: The study findings suggest that the quality of GP-patient communication in palliative care in the Netherlands can be improved. It is recommended that specific communication training programmes for GPs should be developed and evaluated.
Authors: Yanna Van Wesemael; Joachim Cohen; Johan Bilsen; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Wim Distelmans; Luc Deliens Journal: Eval Health Prof Date: 2010-05-18 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: C Lerman; M Daly; W P Walsh; N Resch; J Seay; A Barsevick; L Birenbaum; T Heggan; G Martin Journal: Cancer Date: 1993-11-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Bart H P Osse; Myrra J F J Vernooij-Dassen; Egbert Schadé; Berna de Vree; Maria E T C van den Muijsenbergh; Richard P T M Grol Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2002-07
Authors: Anne Dahlhaus; Nicholas Vanneman; Andrea Siebenhofer; Marie Brosche; Corina Guethlin Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-07-26 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Ivana Mm van der Geest; Patrick Je Bindels; Saskia Mf Pluijm; Erna Mc Michiels; Agnes van der Heide; Rob Pieters; Anne-Sophie E Darlington; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Elizabeth Chuang; Richard Lamkin; Aluko A Hope; Gina Kim; Jean Burg; Michelle Ng Gong Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Nebras Abu Al Hamayel; Sarina R Isenberg; Joshua Sixon; Katherine Clegg Smith; Samantha I Pitts; Sydney M Dy; Susan M Hannum Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Eefje M Sizoo; Martin J B Taphoorn; Bernard Uitdehaag; Jan J Heimans; Luc Deliens; Jaap C Reijneveld; H Roeline W Pasman Journal: Oncologist Date: 2013-01-18
Authors: Willemjan Slort; Annette H Blankenstein; Bart P M Schweitzer; Dirk L Knol; Luc Deliens; Neil K Aaronson; Henriëtte E van der Horst Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 2.497