Literature DB >> 21438739

Historical perspective on the use of animal bioassays to predict carcinogenicity: evolution in design and recognition of utility.

L A Beyer1, B D Beck, T A Lewandowski.   

Abstract

The animal testing protocols used today to evaluate the carcinogenicity of chemicals are very different from those used in the earlier part of the 20th century. To explore how cancer bioassays have changed over time, we surveyed the literature discussing test design and interpretation from the 1930s to the present. We also analyzed compendia of bioassays published by the US Public Health Service (US PHS) from 1938 to 1978, and evaluated the data to understand the evolution of testing methodology (e.g., animals used, test duration) and the types of chemicals being studied. The cancer bioassay evolved in several stages. At the beginning of the 20th century, animal bioassays were primarily used to re-create known human diseases, whereas in the 1940s to 1960s, animal bioassays were largely used to evaluate the safety of chemicals in foods, drugs, and cosmetics. Beginning in the late 1960s and 1970s, chemicals primarily associated with occupational or environmental exposures were also evaluated. Testing strategies now emphasize a suite of tests including multiple in vitro tests and both short-term and long-term animal tests. The objectives of testing are broader, too, with test goals encompassing information regarding mode of action and other parameters aimed at evaluating potential species differences (e.g., in toxicokinetics) and their relevance for evaluating human risks. It is important to consider this evolution when evaluating the testing methodology and scientific conclusions in earlier eras. As toxicology continues to develop, testing methods will continue to change in concert with increased knowledge and understanding.
© 2011 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21438739     DOI: 10.3109/10408444.2010.541222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  4 in total

1.  Advancing chemical risk assessment decision-making with population variability data: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Weihsueh A Chiu; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.957

2.  Petroleum coke exposure leads to altered secretome profiles in human lung models.

Authors:  J A Caruso; P M Stemmer
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 3.  Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC.

Authors:  Jose V Tarazona; Daniele Court-Marques; Manuela Tiramani; Hermine Reich; Rudolf Pfeil; Frederique Istace; Federica Crivellente
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Effects of chronic dietary nitrate supplementation on longevity, vascular function and cancer incidence in rats.

Authors:  Lucas Rannier R A Carvalho; Drielle D Guimarães; Atalia Ferreira L Flôr; Ericka G Leite; Clara R Ruiz; Juliana T de Andrade; Matheus M O Monteiro; Camille M Balarini; Ricardo Barbosa de Lucena; Valeria Cristina Sandrim; Jon O Lundberg; Eddie Weitzberg; Mattias Carlström; Valdir de Andrade Braga
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 11.799

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.