Literature DB >> 21438193

EEG-based brain-computer interfaces: an overview of basic concepts and clinical applications in neurorehabilitation.

Sergio Machado1, Fernanda Araújo, Flávia Paes, Bruna Velasques, Marlo Cunha, Henning Budde, Luis F Basile, Renato Anghinah, Oscar Arias-Carrión, Mauricio Cagy, Roberto Piedade, Tom A de Graaf, Alexander T Sack, Pedro Ribeiro.   

Abstract

Some patients are no longer able to communicate effectively or even interact with the outside world in ways that most of us take for granted. In the most severe cases, tetraplegic or post-stroke patients are literally 'locked in' their bodies, unable to exert any motor control after, for example, a spinal cord injury or a brainstem stroke, requiring alternative methods of communication and control. But we suggest that, in the near future, their brains may offer them a way out. Non-invasive electroencephalogram (EEG)-based brain-computer interfaces (BCI) can be characterized by the technique used to measure brain activity and by the way that different brain signals are translated into commands that control an effector (e.g., controlling a computer cursor for word processing and accessing the internet). This review focuses on the basic concepts of EEG-based BCI, the main advances in communication, motor control restoration and the downregulation of cortical activity, and the mirror neuron system (MNS) in the context of BCI. The latter appears to be relevant for clinical applications in the coming years, particularly for severely limited patients. Hypothetically, MNS could provide a robust way to map neural activity to behavior, representing the high-level information about goals and intentions of these patients. Non-invasive EEG-based BCIs allow brain-derived communication in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and motor control restoration in patients after spinal cord injury and stroke. Epilepsy and attention deficit and hyperactive disorder patients were able to downregulate their cortical activity. Given the rapid progression of EEG-based BCI research over the last few years and the swift ascent of computer processing speeds and signal analysis techniques, we suggest that emerging ideas (e.g., MNS in the context of BCI) related to clinical neurorehabilitation of severely limited patients will generate viable clinical applications in the near future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21438193     DOI: 10.1515/revneuro.2010.21.6.451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Neurosci        ISSN: 0334-1763            Impact factor:   4.353


  10 in total

1.  Automatic and adaptive classification of electroencephalographic signals for brain computer interfaces.

Authors:  Germán Rodríguez-Bermúdez; Pedro J García-Laencina
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Experimental Set Up of P300 Based Brain Computer Interface Using a Bioamplifier and BCI2000 System for Patients with Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Hyeongseok Jeon; Dong Ah Shin
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2015-09-30

3.  Noninvasive brain-computer interface enables communication after brainstem stroke.

Authors:  Eric W Sellers; David B Ryan; Christopher K Hauser
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 4.  Past, Present, and Future of EEG-Based BCI Applications.

Authors:  Kaido Värbu; Naveed Muhammad; Yar Muhammad
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Brain-computer interface control in a virtual reality environment and applications for the internet of things.

Authors:  Christopher G Coogan; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.367

Review 6.  Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface Techniques for Improved Classification Accuracy and Increased Number of Commands: A Review.

Authors:  Keum-Shik Hong; Muhammad Jawad Khan
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Analyzing the Effectiveness of the Brain-Computer Interface for Task Discerning Based on Machine Learning.

Authors:  Jakub Browarczyk; Adam Kurowski; Bozena Kostek
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Defining Surgical Terminology and Risk for Brain Computer Interface Technologies.

Authors:  Eric C Leuthardt; Daniel W Moran; Tim R Mullen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  PEDOT:PSS Interfaces Support the Development of Neuronal Synaptic Networks with Reduced Neuroglia Response In vitro.

Authors:  Giada Cellot; Paola Lagonegro; Giuseppe Tarabella; Denis Scaini; Filippo Fabbri; Salvatore Iannotta; Maurizio Prato; Giancarlo Salviati; Laura Ballerini
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 10.  State of the Art of Non-Invasive Electrode Materials for Brain-Computer Interface.

Authors:  Haowen Yuan; Yao Li; Junjun Yang; Hongjie Li; Qinya Yang; Cuiping Guo; Shenmin Zhu; Xiaokang Shu
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.891

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.