Literature DB >> 21437962

Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function item bank in orthopaedic patients.

Man Hung1, Daniel O Clegg, Tom Greene, Charles L Saltzman.   

Abstract

The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) physical function item bank v1 (PPFIB) contains 124 item response theory (IRT) calibrated items (Rose et al. 2008. J Clin Epidemiol 61:17–33).We report the psychometric properties of these items within an outpatient, orthopaedic patient population. In particular, we investigated whether a single unidimensional IRT scale can adequately define physical function of patients presenting with primarily upper or lower extremity orthopaedic complaints. We conducted a prospective study at an orthopaedic outpatient clinic to collect data from 865 adult patients with all 124 PROMIS physical function items and seven demographic items. Items were evaluated by a Rasch model. Total variance (60.6%) across the 124 items was explained by a single Rasch dimension. The variance explained by the second dimension was 7.7%, reflecting differential item functioning in the upper and lower extremity patients. The upper extremity physical function items had a pronounced ceiling effect. A single physical function dimension accounts for most of the item variance in the PPFIB, suggesting that the items are measuring predominantly one single construct. Separate subscales for lower versus upper extremities, especially with additional items at the upper trait level of the upper extremity subscale, may further enhance evaluation of physical function in orthopaedic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21437962     DOI: 10.1002/jor.21308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  58 in total

1.  Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computerized adaptive tests in cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Barrett S Boody; Surabhi Bhatt; Aditya S Mazmudar; Wellington K Hsu; Nan E Rothrock; Alpesh A Patel
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2018-01-05

2.  Performance of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) Versus Physical Function (PF) Computer Adaptive Tests (CATs) in Upper Extremity Clinics.

Authors:  Casey M Beleckas; Alex Padovano; Jason Guattery; Aaron M Chamberlain; Jay D Keener; Ryan P Calfee
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 3.  Functional outcomes assessment in shoulder surgery.

Authors:  James D Wylie; James T Beckmann; Erin Granger; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-11-18

4.  Evaluation of Version 2.0 of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test in Nonshoulder Upper Extremity Patients.

Authors:  Andrew R Tyser; Man Hung; Jerry Bounsanga; Maren W Voss; Nikolas H Kazmers
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  The Relationship of PROMIS Pain Interference and Physical Function Scales.

Authors:  Richard Kendall; Bill Wagner; Darrel Brodke; Jerry Bounsanga; Maren Voss; Yushan Gu; Ryan Spiker; Brandon Lawrence; Man Hung
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  PROMIS Pain Interference and Physical Function Scores Correlate With the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) in Patients With Hallux Valgus.

Authors:  Devon C Nixon; Jeremy J McCormick; Jeffrey E Johnson; Sandra E Klein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The PROMIS physical function correlates with the QuickDASH in patients with upper extremity illness.

Authors:  Celeste L Overbeek; Sjoerd P F T Nota; Prakash Jayakumar; Michiel G Hageman; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Performance of PROMIS Global-10 Compared With Legacy Instruments for Rotator Cuff Disease.

Authors:  Allen D Nicholson; Hafiz F Kassam; Steven D Pan; Jacob E Berman; Theodore A Blaine; David Kovacevic
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 9.  Measuring outcomes in hand surgery.

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.017

10.  The effect of feedback regarding coping strategies and illness behavior on hand surgery patient satisfaction and communication: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jos J Mellema; Casey M O'Connor; Celeste L Overbeek; Michiel G Hageman; David Ring
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.