PURPOSE: Models of colon cancer in small rodents are of particular interest as they most closely simulate the development and growth of colonic cancer in humans. Micro-computed tomography has been used for detection of polyps in murine models of colon cancer. The study was performed to evaluate whether a novel high-speed continuous-rotation, single-breath-hold scanning protocol in combination with double-contrasting of the colon can be successfully applied for colonoscopy of live mice at acquisition times of 40 s. METHODS: C57BL/6JApcMin/+ mice were intubated and ventilated. After double-contrasting the colon with barium and air, mice underwent continuous rotation micro-CT (mean resolution 41 × 41 × 53 μm) during a single-breath-hold period of 40 s. Sensitivity to detect colon polyps by four blinded radiologists was analysed. Number and location of polyps were verified in the excised colon. Radiation dose was measured using a thermoluminescence dosimeter placed within the distal colon. RESULTS: In six of seven mice, a total of 12 polyps were detected in the explanted colon (one mouse without polyps). One tumor (8.3%) was located in the proximal third, seven tumors (58.1%) and four tumors (33.2%) were located in the middle and in the distal third of the colon, respectively. Mean tumor volume was 6.5 ± 3.6 mm(3). Sensitivity to detect colon polyps was 0.85 ± 0.1. Mean radiation dose was 0.241 ± 0.002 Gy. CONCLUSION: Using a high-speed continuous rotation micro-CT protocol, double-contrast single-breath-hold colonoscopy in mice is feasible and yields sufficient contrast to visualize the proximal colonic folds and to detect colonic polyps in vivo.
PURPOSE: Models of colon cancer in small rodents are of particular interest as they most closely simulate the development and growth of colonic cancer in humans. Micro-computed tomography has been used for detection of polyps in murine models of colon cancer. The study was performed to evaluate whether a novel high-speed continuous-rotation, single-breath-hold scanning protocol in combination with double-contrasting of the colon can be successfully applied for colonoscopy of live mice at acquisition times of 40 s. METHODS: C57BL/6JApcMin/+ mice were intubated and ventilated. After double-contrasting the colon with barium and air, mice underwent continuous rotation micro-CT (mean resolution 41 × 41 × 53 μm) during a single-breath-hold period of 40 s. Sensitivity to detect colon polyps by four blinded radiologists was analysed. Number and location of polyps were verified in the excised colon. Radiation dose was measured using a thermoluminescence dosimeter placed within the distal colon. RESULTS: In six of seven mice, a total of 12 polyps were detected in the explanted colon (one mouse without polyps). One tumor (8.3%) was located in the proximal third, seven tumors (58.1%) and four tumors (33.2%) were located in the middle and in the distal third of the colon, respectively. Mean tumor volume was 6.5 ± 3.6 mm(3). Sensitivity to detect colon polyps was 0.85 ± 0.1. Mean radiation dose was 0.241 ± 0.002 Gy. CONCLUSION: Using a high-speed continuous rotation micro-CT protocol, double-contrast single-breath-hold colonoscopy in mice is feasible and yields sufficient contrast to visualize the proximal colonic folds and to detect colonic polyps in vivo.
Authors: Perry J Pickhardt; Richard B Halberg; Andrew J Taylor; Ben Y Durkee; Jason Fine; Fred T Lee; Jamey P Weichert Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-02-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nicole M Sodir; Xuan Chen; Ryan Park; Andrea E Nickel; Peter S Conti; Rex Moats; James R Bading; Darryl Shibata; Peter W Laird Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-09-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: E H Huang; J J Carter; R L Whelan; Y H Liu; J O Rosenberg; H Rotterdam; A M Schmidt; D M Stern; K A Forde Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2001-10-13 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Benjamin Y Durkee; Sarah R Mudd; Calista N Roen; Linda Clipson; Michael A Newton; Jamey P Weichert; Perry J Pickhardt; Richard B Halberg Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Benjamin Y Durkee; Kazuhiko Shinki; Michael A Newton; Caitlin E Iverson; Jamey P Weichert; William F Dove; Richard B Halberg Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: C Chad Quarles; Martin Lepage; D Lee Gorden; Barbara Fingleton; Thomas E Yankeelov; Ronald R Price; Lynn M Matrisian; John C Gore; J Oliver McIntyre Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Lilia V Ileva; Marcelino Bernardo; Matthew R Young; Lisa A Riffle; James L Tatum; Joseph D Kalen; Peter L Choyke Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Hanne Boll; Stefanie Nittka; Fabian Doyon; Michael Neumaier; Alexander Marx; Martin Kramer; Christoph Groden; Marc A Brockmann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-09-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Stefanie Kirschner; Bettina Mürle; Manuela Felix; Anna Arns; Christoph Groden; Frederik Wenz; Andreas Hug; Gerhard Glatting; Martin Kramer; Frank A Giordano; Marc A Brockmann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dennis Jung; Rafael Heiss; Viktoria Kramer; Oana-Maria Thoma; Adrian P Regensburger; Wolfgang Rascher; Michael Uder; Markus F Neurath; Ferdinand Knieling; Maximilian J Waldner Journal: Theranostics Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Connor A Wathen; Nathan Foje; Tony van Avermaete; Bernadette Miramontes; Sarah E Chapaman; Todd A Sasser; Raghuraman Kannan; Steven Gerstler; W Matthew Leevy Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2013-05-27 Impact factor: 3.576