Literature DB >> 21436676

Proliferative nodules arising within congenital melanocytic nevi: a histologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analyses of 43 cases.

Pushkar A Phadke1, Dinesh Rakheja, Long P Le, Maria Angelica Selim, Payal Kapur, Amy Davis, Martin C Mihm, Mai P Hoang.   

Abstract

The histopathologic interpretation of proliferative nodules (PNs) in congenital melanocytic nevi can present significant challenges as some PNs may exhibit atypical features that make the distinction from melanoma difficult. We compared histologic features, Ki-67%, PHH3, and CD117% expression levels by immunohistochemistry in 18 benign and 25 atypical PNs (from 41 patients) with that of background congenital nevi (of these 43 cases), 10 congenital nevi, and 3 dermal melanomas arising in congenital melanocytic lesions. In addition, we evaluated the presence of BRAF, GNAQ, HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS mutations in all groups using the SNaPshot Multiplex System. Follow-up was available on 19 patients (9 benign and 10 atypical PNs) (range, 2 to 20 y; median, 8 y) and all were alive with no evidence of disease. The specific histologic features of atypical PNs, such as sharp demarcation (P<0.001), expansile growth (P<0.001), epidermal effacement (P<0.001), nuclear pleomorphism (P<0.001), and increased mitoses (P<0.001), differed significantly from those of benign PNs. Immunohistochemical results showed that Ki-67% and PHH3 scores, but not CD117% expression, were significantly higher (P<0.05) in atypical PNs. Molecular analyses showed that the PNs and background congenital melanocytic nevi of the giant congenital nevi possess more frequent NRAS mutations and infrequent BRAF mutations when compared with those of the remaining cases. These findings suggest that histologic features and Ki-67 and PHH3 expression levels are the strongest parameters to distinguish between benign versus atypical PNs. The immunohistochemical results suggest that atypical PNs are distinct borderline lesions residing between benign PNs and dermal melanomas. Although numerous mutations are detected in the samples, the diagnostic use of molecular analysis in this regard is limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21436676     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31821375ea

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  19 in total

1.  Updates on Psoriasis and Cutaneous Oncology: Proceedings from the 2015 MauiDerm Meeting.

Authors:  Seemal R Desai; Ilona J Frieden; Joel M Gelfand; Whitney High; Arthur Kavanaugh; Ashfaq A Marghoob; David M Ozog; Ted Rosen; Linda Stein Gold; Bruce Strober; Neil Swanson; George Martin
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2015-09

2.  Mass Spectrometry Imaging Can Distinguish on a Proteomic Level Between Proliferative Nodules Within a Benign Congenital Nevus and Malignant Melanoma.

Authors:  Rossitza Lazova; Zhe Yang; Constantin El Habr; Young Lim; Keith Adam Choate; Erin H Seeley; Richard M Caprioli; Li Yangqun
Journal:  Am J Dermatopathol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.533

3.  Reduced H3K27me3 Expression Is Common in Nodular Melanomas of Childhood Associated With Congenital Melanocytic Nevi But Not in Proliferative Nodules.

Authors:  Klaus J Busam; Kara N Shah; Pedram Gerami; Thomas Sitzman; Achim A Jungbluth; Veronica Kinsler
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Prepubertal Melanoma Arising within a Medium-Sized Congenital Melanocytic Nevus.

Authors:  Leah Lalor; Klaus Busam; Kara Shah
Journal:  Pediatr Dermatol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  BRAF V600E status adds incremental value to current risk classification systems in predicting papillary thyroid carcinoma recurrence.

Authors:  Jason D Prescott; Peter M Sadow; Richard A Hodin; Long Phi Le; Randall D Gaz; Gregory W Randolph; Antonia E Stephen; Sareh Parangi; Gilbert H Daniels; Carrie C Lubitz
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 6.  Genetics of melanocytic nevi.

Authors:  Mi Ryung Roh; Philip Eliades; Sameer Gupta; Hensin Tsao
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.693

Review 7.  Biologically distinct subsets of nevi.

Authors:  Tova Rogers; Maria L Marino; Patricia Raciti; Manu Jain; Klaus J Busam; Michael A Marchetti; Ashfaq A Marghoob
Journal:  G Ital Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.011

8.  Hiding in plain sight: molecular genetics applied to giant congenital melanocytic nevi.

Authors:  Heather C Etchevers
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 8.551

9.  Multiple congenital melanocytic nevi and neurocutaneous melanosis are caused by postzygotic mutations in codon 61 of NRAS.

Authors:  Veronica A Kinsler; Anna C Thomas; Miho Ishida; Neil W Bulstrode; Sam Loughlin; Sandra Hing; Jane Chalker; Kathryn McKenzie; Sayeda Abu-Amero; Olga Slater; Estelle Chanudet; Rodger Palmer; Deborah Morrogh; Philip Stanier; Eugene Healy; Neil J Sebire; Gudrun E Moore
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 8.551

10.  Giant congenital melanocytic naevus with proliferative nodules mimicking congenital malignant melanoma: a case report and review of the literature of congenital melanoma.

Authors:  Massimiliano Scalvenzi; Franco Palmisano; Sara Cacciapuoti; Fiorella Migliaro; Maria Siano; Stefania Staibano; Luigi Tornillo; Claudia Costa
Journal:  Case Rep Dermatol Med       Date:  2013-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.