Literature DB >> 21436529

Decoding position, velocity, or goal: does it matter for brain-machine interfaces?

A R Marathe1, D M Taylor.   

Abstract

Arm end-point position, end-point velocity, and the intended final location or 'goal' of a reach have all been decoded from cortical signals for use in brain-machine interface (BMI) applications. These different aspects of arm movement can be decoded from the brain and used directly to control the position, velocity, or movement goal of a device. However, these decoded parameters can also be remapped to control different aspects of movement, such as using the decoded position of the hand to control the velocity of a device. People easily learn to use the position of a joystick to control the velocity of an object in a videogame. Similarly, in BMI systems, the position, velocity, or goal of a movement could be decoded from the brain and remapped to control some other aspect of device movement. This study evaluates how easily people make transformations between position, velocity, and reach goal in BMI systems. It also evaluates how different amounts of decoding error impact on device control with and without these transformations. Results suggest some remapping options can significantly improve BMI control. This study provides guidance on what remapping options to use when various amounts of decoding error are present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21436529      PMCID: PMC3140465          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  35 in total

1.  Prediction of muscle activity by populations of sequentially recorded primary motor cortex neurons.

Authors:  M M Morrow; L E Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Making arm movements within different parts of space: the premotor and motor cortical representation of a coordinate system for reaching to visual targets.

Authors:  R Caminiti; P B Johnson; C Galli; S Ferraina; Y Burnod
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Closed-loop neural control of cursor motion using a Kalman filter.

Authors:  W Wu; A Shaikhouni; J P Donoghue; M J Black
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

4.  Neural representations of the target (goal) of visually guided arm movements in three motor areas of the monkey.

Authors:  G E Alexander; M D Crutcher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Changes in the temporal pattern of primary motor cortex activity in a directional isometric force versus limb movement task.

Authors:  L E Sergio; J F Kalaska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Force and the motor cortex.

Authors:  J Ashe
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Do neurons in the motor cortex encode movement direction? An alternative hypothesis.

Authors:  F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1988-08-15       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Relation of pyramidal tract activity to force exerted during voluntary movement.

Authors:  E V Evarts
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Instant neural control of a movement signal.

Authors:  Mijail D Serruya; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos; Liam Paninski; Matthew R Fellows; John P Donoghue
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-14       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Neural control of computer cursor velocity by decoding motor cortical spiking activity in humans with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Sung-Phil Kim; John D Simeral; Leigh R Hochberg; John P Donoghue; Michael J Black
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 5.379

View more
  4 in total

1.  The impact of command signal power distribution, processing delays, and speed scaling on neurally-controlled devices.

Authors:  A R Marathe; D M Taylor
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Decoding continuous limb movements from high-density epidural electrode arrays using custom spatial filters.

Authors:  A R Marathe; D M Taylor
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Recasting brain-machine interface design from a physical control system perspective.

Authors:  Yin Zhang; Steven M Chase
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 4.  Data-Driven Transducer Design and Identification for Internally-Paced Motor Brain Computer Interfaces: A Review.

Authors:  Marie-Caroline Schaeffer; Tetiana Aksenova
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 4.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.