Literature DB >> 21435920

Atypical variants of classic achalasia are common and currently under-recognized: a study of prevalence and clinical features.

Kelly M Galey1, Candice L Wilshire, Stefan Niebisch, Carolyn E Jones, Daniel P Raymond, Virginia R Litle, Thomas J Watson, Jeffrey H Peters.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advances in esophageal manometry have facilitated identification of variants of achalasia, suggesting they are more common than previously thought. This study assesses the frequency and clinical characteristics of patients with motility abnormalities similar to, but not meeting criteria for, classic achalasia. STUDY
DESIGN: Records of patients undergoing high-resolution esophageal manometry between January 2008 and January 2010 were screened for diagnosis of achalasia, impaired lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation, or severe peristaltic dysfunction of the esophageal body. Forty-four patients with classic achalasia and 31 with variant characteristics were identified. Clinical and manometric characteristics were recorded and compared.
RESULTS: Variant achalasia was almost as common as the classic type (31 versus 44 patients). Eighty-two percent (36 of 44) of those with classic and 48% (15 of 31) of those with variant characteristics had dysphagia. Classic achalasia patients' mean age was 62 years (SD 19 years) versus 53 years (SD 14 years) in the variant group. The classic achalasia group had 26 male patients and 18 female patients and the variant group had 9 male patients and 22 female patients. Two thirds (21 of 31) of the variant group had impaired LES relaxation. Three variant patterns emerged: impaired LES relaxation with normal/hypertensive peristalsis (n = 10), impaired/borderline LES relaxation with mixed peristalsis/simultaneous contractions (n = 14), and impaired/normal LES and aperistalsis with occasional short segment peristalsis (n = 7). Mean intrabolus pressure was 16.3 mmHg in variant patients with normal LES relaxation and 23.1 mmHg in those with impaired relaxation.
CONCLUSIONS: Variants of achalasia are more common than previously recognized. LES dysfunction defined by high relaxation pressure occurs in two-thirds of variant achalasia patients and might be a hallmark that could direct therapy. The notion that esophageal body dysfunction/aperistalsis in achalasia is all or none should be reconsidered.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21435920     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  5 in total

1.  High-resolution manometry classifications for idiopathic achalasia in patients with Chagas' disease esophagopathy.

Authors:  Fernando P P Vicentine; Fernando A M Herbella; Marco E Allaix; Luciana C Silva; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  High-resolution manometry in diagnosis and treatment of achalasia: help or hype.

Authors:  Joel E Richter
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2014-12

Review 3.  The spectrum of achalasia: lessons from studies of pathophysiology and high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Guy Boeckxstaens
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Changes in the Treatment of Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders Imposed by the New Classification for Esophageal Motility Disorders on High Resolution Manometry (Chicago Classification 4.0).

Authors:  Fernando A M Herbella; Leonardo M Del Grande; Francisco Schlottmann; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Elevated average maximum intrabolus pressure on high-resolution manometry is associated with esophageal dysmotility and delayed esophageal emptying on timed barium esophagram.

Authors:  Katelyn E Madigan; J Shawn Smith; Joni K Evans; Steven B Clayton
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.067

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.