Literature DB >> 21435772

[Peripheral arterial disease: efficacy of the oscillometric method].

Jorge Vega1, Sebastián Romaní, Francisco J Garcipérez, Lucia Vicente, Nazaret Pacheco, José Zamorano, José J Gómez-Barrado, Juan F Sánchez Muñoz-Torrero.   

Abstract

Relatively little is known on how the Doppler method compares with oscillometric measurement using a conventional automatic blood pressure device to determine the ankle-brachial index, when determinations are performed by physicians with little experience. To assess the diagnostic efficacy of both methods in this professional group, we calculated their sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value in 158 legs of 85 patients with symptoms of intermittent claudication. Angiography was used as the gold standard. Of the legs examined, 131 showed significant arterial obstruction. The oscillometric method showed 97% sensitivity, 89% specificity, 98% positive predictive value, and 86% negative predictive value. The Doppler method showed 95% sensitivity, 56% specificity, 91% positive predictive value, and 68% negative predictive value. This study suggests that the automatic blood pressure equipment has greater diagnostic accuracy when the test is performed by physicians not specifically trained to use the Doppler probe. Full English text available from: www.revespcardiol.org.
Copyright © 2010 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21435772     DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2010.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol        ISSN: 0300-8932            Impact factor:   4.753


  6 in total

Review 1.  Ankle brachial index for the diagnosis of lower limb peripheral arterial disease.

Authors:  Fay Crawford; Karen Welch; Alina Andras; Francesca M Chappell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-14

2.  Diagnostic Accuracy Study of an Oscillometric Ankle-Brachial Index in Peripheral Arterial Disease: The Influence of Oscillometric Errors and Calcified Legs.

Authors:  Ángel Herráiz-Adillo; Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno; Iván Cavero-Redondo; Celia Álvarez-Bueno; Miriam Garrido-Miguel; Blanca Notario-Pacheco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Ankle brachial index as a surrogate to vascular imaging in evaluation of peripheral artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Ejiofor Ugwu; Anthony Anyanwu; Michael Olamoyegun
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Ankle-Brachial Index determination and peripheral arterial disease diagnosis by an oscillometric blood pressure device in primary care: validation and diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Mark R Nelson; Stephen Quinn; Tania M Winzenberg; Faline Howes; Louise Shiel; Christopher M Reid
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Validity and reliability of the ankle-brachial index by oscillometric blood pressure and automated ankle-brachial index.

Authors:  Sukanya Chongthawonsatid; Somchai Dutsadeevettakul
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 6.  Peripheral vascular disease assessment in the lower limb: a review of current and emerging non-invasive diagnostic methods.

Authors:  Elham Shabani Varaki; Gaetano D Gargiulo; Stefania Penkala; Paul P Breen
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.819

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.