Literature DB >> 21435375

Emotional event-related potentials are reduced if negative pictures presented at fixation are unattended.

Stefan Wiens1, Anders Sand, Joakim Norberg, Per Andersson.   

Abstract

Viewing of emotional pictures elicits two event-related potentials (ERPs) to emotional versus neutral pictures: an early posterior negativity (EPN) and a late positive potential (LPP). Because it is unresolved whether these indexes of emotional processing are reduced to task-irrelevant pictures at fixation, negative and neutral pictures from the International Affective Picture Set (IAPS) were shown at fixation together with 6 letters that surrounded the pictures. In separate tasks, participants were instructed to attend either the pictures or the letters. When the pictures were task relevant, results showed an EPN and LPP. In contrast, when the pictures were task irrelevant, the EPN was eliminated and the LPP reduced. Performance was high in both tasks (hit rates>87%), but somewhat better when the pictures were relevant. However, analyses showed no relationship between this performance difference and the differences in EPN and LPP between tasks. These results suggest that emotional processing of strong, negative pictures is sensitive to manipulations of attention even if the pictures are shown at fixation.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21435375     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.03.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  13 in total

1.  High negative valence does not protect emotional event-related potentials from spatial inattention and perceptual load.

Authors:  Stefan Wiens; Tanaz Molapour; Judith Overfeld; Anders Sand
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Now you feel it, now you don't: Motivated attention to emotional content is modulated by age and task demands.

Authors:  Didem Pehlivanoglu; Paul Verhaeghen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Responses to affective pictures depicting humans: late positive potential reveals a sex-related effect in processing that is not present in subjective ratings.

Authors:  Ryousuke Kato; Yuji Takeda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Emotional event-related potentials are larger to figures than scenes but are similarly reduced by inattention.

Authors:  Henrik Nordström; Stefan Wiens
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 3.288

5.  Response inhibition during cue reactivity in problem gamblers: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Ruth J van Holst; Mieke van Holstein; Wim van den Brink; Dick J Veltman; Anna E Goudriaan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of attention manipulations on motivated attention to feared and nonfeared negative distracters in spider fear.

Authors:  Joakim Norberg; Stefan Wiens
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 7.  Exogenous (automatic) attention to emotional stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Luis Carretié
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  The influence of affective state on exogenous attention to emotional distractors: behavioral and electrophysiological correlates.

Authors:  Alejandra Carboni; Dominique Kessel; Almudena Capilla; Luis Carretié
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Brain activation to task-irrelevant disorder-related threat in social anxiety disorder: The impact of symptom severity.

Authors:  Carina Yvonne Heitmann; Katharina Feldker; Paula Neumeister; Leonie Brinkmann; Elisabeth Schrammen; Pienie Zwitserlood; Thomas Straube
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  Acute Stress and Perceptual Load Consume the Same Attentional Resources: A Behavioral-ERP Study.

Authors:  Chen Tiferet-Dweck; Michael Hensel; Clemens Kirschbaum; Joseph Tzelgov; Alon Friedman; Moti Salti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.