Literature DB >> 21435300

Reasons, rationalities, and procreative beneficence: need Häyry stand politely by while Savulescu and Herissone-Kelly disagree?

Peter Herissone-Kelly1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21435300      PMCID： PMC3586665          DOI： 10.1017/S0963180110000903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics        ISSN： 0963-1801            Impact factor:   1.284


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

Review 1.  The fallacy of the Principle of Procreative Beneficence.

Authors:  Rebecca Bennett
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 2.  Procreative beneficence and the prospective parent.

Authors:  P Herissone-Kelly
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  The best possible child.

Authors:  Michael Parker
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children.

Authors:  J Savulescu
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.898
  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Rationality and the genetic challenge revisited.

Authors:  Matti Hayry
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.284
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.