Literature DB >> 21433020

The Gelfoam® plug: an alternative treatment for small eardrum perforations.

Anders Niklasson1, Krister Tano.   

Abstract

AIM: To examine if a Gelfoam® plug in combination with surgical removal of the perforation edges could be an alternative to the widely accepted fat plug treatment for smaller ear drum perforations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study of 17 consecutive patients with persistent small ear drum perforations considered for myringoplasty. The perforations were central perforations 2 to 4 mm in diameter. Patient ages ranged from 6 to 83 years, and the operation was performed under general anesthesia with mask ventilation in children and under topical local anesthesia in adults. A Gelfoam® plug was inserted into the perforation after surgical removal of the perforation edges. The follow-up time was more than 3 months.
RESULTS: The closure rate of the ear drum was 83% (15/18). Pure tone average (PTA) was 19 dB preoperatively and 16 dB postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: We show for the first time in humans that a Gelfoam® plug in combination with surgical removal of the perforation edges seems to result in about the same closure rate as the fat plug technique in persistent small ear drum perforations. Moreover, the method using Gelfoam® is simpler and faster than the fat plug technique. We suggest that randomized studies comparing the Gelfoam® plug technique with the fat plug technique should be performed.
Copyright © 2011 The American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21433020     DOI: 10.1002/lary.21451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  12 in total

1.  In response to: Hyaluronic acid fat graft myringoplasty vs. fat patch fat graft myringoplasty.

Authors:  Zhengcai Lou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Factors affecting the treatment outcomes of myringoplasty in patients with small tympanic membrane perforations.

Authors:  Shih-Lung Chen; Shih-Wei Yang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Fat volume is critical when performing fat-plug myringoplasty.

Authors:  Zhong-Hai Jin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Comparing the outcome of tympanoplasties using bovine pericardium underlay xenografts versus butterfly inlay autografts.

Authors:  Zhufang Jiang; Zihan Lou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  A better design is needed for clinical studies of chronic tympanic membrane perforations using biological materials.

Authors:  Zheng-Cai Lou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Scaffolds for tympanic membrane regeneration in rats.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Sharon Leanne Redmond; Bing Mei Teh; Sheng Yan; Yan Wang; Lin Zhou; Charley A Budgeon; Robert Henry Eikelboom; Marcus David Atlas; Rodney James Dilley; Minghao Zheng; Robert Jeffery Marano
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  A trans-well-based cellular model for the rapid pre-evaluation of tympanic membrane repair materials.

Authors:  Shih-Han Hung; Chin-Hui Su; How Tseng
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Comparison of permeatal medial placement of graft without raising the tympano-meatal flaps to conventional methods of myringoplasty: An experience at tertiary care hospital in Pakistan.

Authors:  Saleem Asif Niazi; Zaheer Ul Hassan; Khaula Atif; Saeed Ullah
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

9.  Topical Application of bFGF Alone for the Regeneration of Chronic Tympanic Membrane Perforations: A Preliminary Case Series.

Authors:  Zihan Lou; Zhengcai Lou; Kangfeng Jin; Junzhi Sun; Zhengnong Chen
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 10.  FGF2 and EGF for the Regeneration of Tympanic Membrane: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zhengcai Lou; Zihan Lou; Yumeng Jiang; Zhengnong Chen
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.