Literature DB >> 21432997

Optimization of electrical stimulation parameters for enhanced cell proliferation on biomaterial surfaces.

Ashutosh Kumar Dubey1, Shourya Dutta Gupta, Bikramjit Basu.   

Abstract

From the point of view of biocompatibility of bone analog materials, cell-material interaction is of fundamental importance. In this article, we report the effect of pulse electric field stimulation on cell-material interaction by analyzing cellular functionality and viability. An in-house fabricated pulse electric field setup was used for the application of electric field during cell culture experiments. To optimize voltage/electric field, the first set of exploratory experiments was conducted with varying field strength at fixed frequency, and subsequently, the frequency of the electrical stimulation was varied to study its influence on the proliferation of L929 mouse fibroblast cells on gelatin-coated control disc. Subsequently, L929 cells were cultured on hydroxyapatite (HA) and HA-40 wt % BaTiO₃ composite. Cell-cultured samples were analyzed qualitatively as well as quantitatively using fluorescence microscope and scanning electron microscope. It has been demonstrated that due to the application of electric field during the cell culture experiment, the cell proliferation and the cell spreading on the surface of the biomaterials were enhanced within a narrow window of voltage/frequency of electrical stimulation. At lower field intensities, the energy density is quite low and increases parabolically with field strength. There is no significant increase in the temperature (ΔT ~10⁻⁵ K) of the medium due to the application of short duration pulse electric field. This led us to believe that electric field with appropriate strength and duration can enhance the cell-material interaction.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21432997     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  13 in total

1.  Investigation of In Vitro Bone Cell Adhesion and Proliferation on Ti Using Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Subhadip Bodhak; Susmita Bose; William C Kinsel; Amit Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 7.328

2.  Pulsed electric field mediated in vitro cellular response of fibroblast and osteoblast-like cells on conducting austenitic stainless steel substrate.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar Dubey; Parnika Agrawal; R Devesh Kumar Misra; Bikramjit Basu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Absence of systemic toxicity in mouse model towards BaTiO3 nanoparticulate based eluate treatment.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar Dubey; Greeshma Thrivikraman; Bikramjit Basu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Monophasic Pulsed Microcurrent of 1-8 Hz Increases the Number of Human Dermal Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Yoshikawa; Masaharu Sugimoto; Mikiko Uemura; Masafumi Matsuo; Noriaki Maeshige; Emma Tabe Eko Niba; Hisato Shuntoh
Journal:  Prog Rehabil Med       Date:  2016-10-26

5.  Cardiac stem cells with electrical stimulation improve ischaemic heart function through regulation of connective tissue growth factor and miR-378.

Authors:  Sun Wook Kim; Ha Won Kim; Wei Huang; Motoi Okada; Jeffrey A Welge; Yigang Wang; Muhammad Ashraf
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 10.787

6.  Electrical stimulation promotes wound healing by enhancing dermal fibroblast activity and promoting myofibroblast transdifferentiation.

Authors:  Mahmoud Rouabhia; Hyunjin Park; Shiyun Meng; Habib Derbali; Ze Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Bioelectronics-on-a-chip for cardio myoblast proliferation enhancement using electric field stimulation.

Authors:  Ángel Aragón; María Cebro-Márquez; Eliseo Perez; Antonio Pazos; Ricardo Lage; José Ramón González-Juanatey; Isabel Moscoso; Carmen Bao-Varela; Daniel Nieto
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2020-09-07

Review 8.  Electrical stimulation in bone tissue engineering treatments.

Authors:  Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; John Howard Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  Development of a miniaturized stimulation device for electrical stimulation of cells.

Authors:  Gordon Minru Xiong; Anh Tuan Do; Jun Kit Wang; Chee Leong Yeoh; Kiat Seng Yeo; Cleo Choong
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 4.355

10.  Magnetically induced electrostimulation of human osteoblasts results in enhanced cell viability and osteogenic differentiation.

Authors:  Bettina Hiemer; Josefin Ziebart; Anika Jonitz-Heincke; Philip Christian Grunert; Yukun Su; Doris Hansmann; Rainer Bader
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 4.101

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.