Literature DB >> 21432891

Flexible modeling of the effects of continuous prognostic factors in relative survival.

Amel Mahboubi1, Michal Abrahamowicz, Roch Giorgi, Christine Binquet, Claire Bonithon-Kopp, Catherine Quantin.   

Abstract

Relative survival methods permit separating the effects of prognostic factors on disease-related 'excess mortality' from their effects on other-causes 'natural mortality', even when individual causes of death are unknown. As in conventional 'crude' survival, accurate assessment of prognostic factors requires testing and possibly modeling of non-proportional effects and, for continuous covariates, of non-linear relationships with the hazard. We propose a flexible extension of the additive-hazards relative survival model, in which the observed all-causes mortality hazard is represented by a sum of disease-related 'excess' and natural mortality hazards. In our flexible model, the three functions representing (i) the baseline hazard for 'excess' mortality, (ii) the time-dependent effects, and (iii) for continuous covariates, non-linear effects, on the logarithm of this hazard, are all modeled by low-dimension cubic regression splines. Non-parametric likelihood ratio tests are proposed to test the time-dependent and non-linear effects. The accuracy of the estimated functions is evaluated in multivariable simulations. To illustrate the new insights offered by the proposed model, we apply it to re-assess the effects of patient age and of secular trends on disease-related mortality in colon cancer.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21432891     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  4 in total

1.  On comparison of net survival curves.

Authors:  Klemen Pavlič; Maja Pohar Perme
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  A reference relative time-scale as an alternative to chronological age for cohorts with long follow-up.

Authors:  Margaret Anne Hurley
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2015-12-18

3.  Comparison of Cox proportional hazards regression and generalized Cox regression models applied in dementia risk prediction.

Authors:  Jantje Goerdten; Isabelle Carrière; Graciela Muniz-Terrera
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2020-06-14

4.  Prediction of cancer survival for cohorts of patients most recently diagnosed using multi-model inference.

Authors:  Camille Maringe; Aurélien Belot; Bernard Rachet
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.021

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.