Literature DB >> 2143279

Oral contraception and congenital malformations in offspring: a review and meta-analysis of the prospective studies.

M B Bracken1.   

Abstract

The technique of meta-analysis was used to derive typical estimates of the risk of congenital malformations from oral contraceptive (OC) exposure in early pregnancy. Several definitions were used for non-exposure to reduce bias from this source. Congenital heart defects and limb reduction defects were analyzed separately. The typical relative risk from the 12 prospective studies analyzed was 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.83, 1.19) for all malformations. The definition of non-exposure did not materially change this estimate. The typical risk for congenital heart defects was 1.06 (95% confidence interval 0.72, 1.56) and for limb reduction defects, 1.04 (95% confidence interval 0.30, 3.55). This lack of an association between OCs and birth defects in prospective studies agrees with the results of most of the better-designed case-control studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2143279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Emergency contraception].

Authors:  I Lete Lasa; M Arróniz; R Esquisábel
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  Emergency contraception. Summary of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada's clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  S Dunn; V Davis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Hormonal pregnancy tests in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  J Stanback; E Raymond
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Emergency contraception: a review of current oral options.

Authors:  Marisa N Mendez
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2002-05

Review 5.  Immediate start of hormonal contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Laureen M Lopez; Sara J Newmann; David A Grimes; Kavita Nanda; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

6.  Using a checklist to assess pregnancy in teenagers and young women.

Authors:  Maura K Whiteman; Naomi K Tepper; Melissa Kottke; Kathryn M Curtis; Peggy Goedken; Michele G Mandel; Polly A Marchbanks
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Birth defects in the sons and daughters of women who were exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol (DES).

Authors:  L Titus-Ernstoff; R Troisi; E E Hatch; J R Palmer; M Hyer; R Kaufman; E Adam; K Noller; R N Hoover
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2009-11-30

8.  Quality of systematic reviews of observational nontherapeutic studies.

Authors:  Tatyana Shamliyan; Robert L Kane; Stacy Jansen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Examining the use of oral contraceptives in the management of acne.

Authors:  Heather L Salvaggio; Andrea L Zaenglein
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

10.  Can I get pregnant from oral sex? Sexual health misconceptions in e-mails to a reproductive health website.

Authors:  L L Wynn; Angel M Foster; James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.