OBJECTIVES: The demand for mobile bathing service (MBS) is increasing in the Japanese society. Therefore, we assessed the risk of MBS-associated infection in MBS clients and their caregivers by examining the bacterial colonization of MBS equipment and utensils. METHODS: Bacterial isolates collected by the stamp agar culture method were examined by disk diffusion assay for their susceptibility to the following drugs: imipenem, ciprofloxacin, amikacin, azutreonam, ceftazidim, meropenem, piperacillin, tobramycin, ofloxacin and cefoperazone. Furthermore, these isolates were subtyped bySpeI-pulsed field gel electrophoresis (SpeI-PFGE). RESULTS: Fifty-fourP. aeruginosa isolates were recovered from different sampling sites, and of these, 26 (47.3%) were isolated from pillows. Eighteen isolates (33.3%) were imipenem (IPM) resistant. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 17 isolates were between 16 and 32 μg/ml, and the MIC of one isolate was greater than 32 μg/ml. TheSpeI-PFGE typing of IPM-resistant isolates revealed that 13 of the 18 isolates were closely related (F=1.0-0.87). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that MBS equipment and utensils, particularly pillows, are the primary sources of bacterial contamination and transmission and that there is a risk of MBS-mediated infection among MBS clients and their caregivers.
OBJECTIVES: The demand for mobile bathing service (MBS) is increasing in the Japanese society. Therefore, we assessed the risk of MBS-associated infection in MBS clients and their caregivers by examining the bacterial colonization of MBS equipment and utensils. METHODS: Bacterial isolates collected by the stamp agar culture method were examined by disk diffusion assay for their susceptibility to the following drugs: imipenem, ciprofloxacin, amikacin, azutreonam, ceftazidim, meropenem, piperacillin, tobramycin, ofloxacin and cefoperazone. Furthermore, these isolates were subtyped bySpeI-pulsed field gel electrophoresis (SpeI-PFGE). RESULTS: Fifty-fourP. aeruginosa isolates were recovered from different sampling sites, and of these, 26 (47.3%) were isolated from pillows. Eighteen isolates (33.3%) were imipenem (IPM) resistant. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 17 isolates were between 16 and 32 μg/ml, and the MIC of one isolate was greater than 32 μg/ml. TheSpeI-PFGE typing of IPM-resistant isolates revealed that 13 of the 18 isolates were closely related (F=1.0-0.87). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that MBS equipment and utensils, particularly pillows, are the primary sources of bacterial contamination and transmission and that there is a risk of MBS-mediated infection among MBS clients and their caregivers.
Entities:
Keywords:
MBS utensils; MBS-mediated infections; imipenem-resistantPseudomonas aeruginosa; long-term care insurance; mobile bathing service (MBS)
Authors: F C Tenover; R D Arbeit; R V Goering; P A Mickelsen; B E Murray; D H Persing; B Swaminathan Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: K Kato; S Iwai; K Kumasaka; A Horikoshi; S Inada; T Inamatsu; Y Ono; H Nishiya; Y Hanatani; T Narita; H Sekino; I Hayashi Journal: J Infect Chemother Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 2.211
Authors: T Nakano; K Hiramatsu; N Hirata; J Murakami; T Ichimiya; I Tokimatsu; E Yamagata; Y Yamakami; T Yamasaki; H Nagai; J Kadota; M Nasu; T Nakano; T Saikawa Journal: Kansenshogaku Zasshi Date: 2001-11
Authors: Etinosa O Igbinosa; Emmanuel E Odjadjare; Isoken H Igbinosa; Phillips O Orhue; May N O Omoigberale; Napoleon I Amhanre Journal: ScientificWorldJournal Date: 2012-04-26