Literature DB >> 21432239

Cost-benefit analysis methods for assessing air pollution control programs in urban environments-A review.

S S Voorhees1, R Sakai, S Araki, H Sato, A Otsu.   

Abstract

The most common method of evaluating beneficial impacts of environmental policies is cost-benefit analysis (CBA). In the present review, CBA methods for air pollution impacts are reviewed. Three types of air pollution effects are identified, including health, productivity, and amenity. Market valuation, stated preference methods, and revealed preference methods are identified for valuing benefits. Three types of costs are deseribed, including private sector costs, societal costs, and governmental regulatory costs. A benefits valuation approach based on Freeman's principals is described. A costs valuation approach based on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Dixon et al. principals is deseribed. Limitations associated with estimates of benefits and costs are summarized. Input assumptions and results are compared for several existing air pollution control analyses. The importance of CBA in environmental policy studies is discussed. Our conceptual approaches should be useful in analyses of urban air pollution impacts and air pollution prevention policies.

Keywords:  benefit valuation; cost estimation; cost-benefit analysis; environmental policy; urban air pollution

Year:  2001        PMID: 21432239      PMCID: PMC2723238          DOI: 10.1007/BF02897948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med        ISSN: 1342-078X            Impact factor:   3.674


  3 in total

1.  Controlling urban air pollution: a benefit-cost assessment.

Authors:  A J Krupnick; P R Portney
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-04-26       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Passive smoking, air pollution, and acute respiratory symptoms in a diary study of student nurses.

Authors:  J Schwartz; S Zeger
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1990-01

3.  An ex post cost-benefit analysis of the nitrogen dioxide air pollution control program in Tokyo.

Authors:  A S Voorhees; S Araki; R Sakai; H Sato
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.235

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Economic evaluation of environmental health interventions to support decision making.

Authors:  Guy Hutton
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2008-12-19

2.  Toward an Improved Air Pollution Warning System in Quebec.

Authors:  Pierre Masselot; Fateh Chebana; Éric Lavigne; Céline Campagna; Pierre Gosselin; Taha B M J Ouarda
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  The Inverse Poisson Functional for forecasting response time to environmental events and global climate change.

Authors:  Daniel S Zachary
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.