OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to delineate the association between residents' perception of the neighborhood's environments and walking time in objectively different regions in Japan. METHODS: Two regions were selected as high and low walkable regions on the basis of differences in their residential density, mixed land use and street connectivity. The subjects in this study were participants in a health promotion program focused on walking sponsored by local governments. A questionnaire was sent to the participants asking about how their perception of the neighborhood's environment related to walking, and the time spent walking per week. There were 237 residents from the high walkable region and 195 from the low walkable region who completed the study survey. RESULTS: The high walkable region had a larger residential density, a high mixed land use and a higher street connectivity than the low walkable region. Walking time, and the scores of the perception of the neighborhood's environment for the high walkable region residents were significantly higher than those for the low walkable region residents. Thus, residents' perception of the neighborhood's environment generally reflected the actual physical environmental characteristics. Residents in the high walkable region whose scores for accessibility and aesthetics were high, spent significantly more walking time. Residents in the low walkable region whose scores for accessibility, safety, convenience and aesthetics were high, spent significantly more walking time. CONCLUSION: The study results suggested that the neighborhood's environment may influence daily walking time. The perceptions of the neighborhood's environmental factors that correlate with walking times differ between the different regional physical environments. Therefore, to promote physical activity, the consideration of environmental factors unique to residents' neighborhood's environments is needed.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to delineate the association between residents' perception of the neighborhood's environments and walking time in objectively different regions in Japan. METHODS: Two regions were selected as high and low walkable regions on the basis of differences in their residential density, mixed land use and street connectivity. The subjects in this study were participants in a health promotion program focused on walking sponsored by local governments. A questionnaire was sent to the participants asking about how their perception of the neighborhood's environment related to walking, and the time spent walking per week. There were 237 residents from the high walkable region and 195 from the low walkable region who completed the study survey. RESULTS: The high walkable region had a larger residential density, a high mixed land use and a higher street connectivity than the low walkable region. Walking time, and the scores of the perception of the neighborhood's environment for the high walkable region residents were significantly higher than those for the low walkable region residents. Thus, residents' perception of the neighborhood's environment generally reflected the actual physical environmental characteristics. Residents in the high walkable region whose scores for accessibility and aesthetics were high, spent significantly more walking time. Residents in the low walkable region whose scores for accessibility, safety, convenience and aesthetics were high, spent significantly more walking time. CONCLUSION: The study results suggested that the neighborhood's environment may influence daily walking time. The perceptions of the neighborhood's environmental factors that correlate with walking times differ between the different regional physical environments. Therefore, to promote physical activity, the consideration of environmental factors unique to residents' neighborhood's environments is needed.
Entities:
Keywords:
health promotion; perception of neighborhood environment; physical activity; physical environment; walking
Authors: Cheryl L Addy; Dawn K Wilson; Karen A Kirtland; Barbara E Ainsworth; Patricia Sharpe; Dexter Kimsey Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Eva Leslie; Brian Saelens; Lawrence Frank; Neville Owen; Adrian Bauman; Neil Coffee; Graeme Hugo Journal: Health Place Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: R C Brownson; R A Housemann; D R Brown; J Jackson-Thompson; A C King; B R Malone; J F Sallis Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Yoshinobu Saito; Yuko Oguma; Shigeru Inoue; Ayumi Tanaka; Yoshitaka Kobori Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2013-05-17 Impact factor: 3.390