BACKGROUND: Our comprehensive cancer centre adopted the WHO recommendation literally in the cancer care guidelines to implement the early integration (EI) of palliative care (PC). Evaluation of the first 2 years of this approach revealed that this guideline was too vague to trigger EI. OBJECTIVE: As a consequence, an interdisciplinary working group was set up to propose and implement a more effective concept. METHODS: An interdisciplinary (PC, oncology, radiotherapy, etc.) working group identified the need to (a) specify the timing of EI and (b) specify PC assignments by (c) providing more clear cut semantic and clinical definitions. As a result of repeated discussion in the different interdisciplinary working groups in charge of developing and consenting a once-yearly update of treatment guidelines [standard operating procedure (SOP)] for each malignancy, the need for disease-specific EI SOPs was identified. RESULTS: SOPs were developed for 19 malignancies (a) to identify a disease-specific point in each disease trajectory to initiate EI ("green flags") and to provide (b) a clear delineation and semantic differentiation of PC assignments ["palliative care" vs. "supportive" or "palliative therapies" ("green" vs. "red flags")]. DISCUSSION: To date, ASCO and WHO recommendations for EI lack detailed information about timing and infrastructure. The guidelines presented here aim to provide the missing information by reporting our developed and consented interdisciplinary guidelines for EI. CONCLUSION: With this concept, the authors provide a framework for realizing EI and hope to initiate a discussion about specific recommendations for EI.
BACKGROUND: Our comprehensive cancer centre adopted the WHO recommendation literally in the cancer care guidelines to implement the early integration (EI) of palliative care (PC). Evaluation of the first 2 years of this approach revealed that this guideline was too vague to trigger EI. OBJECTIVE: As a consequence, an interdisciplinary working group was set up to propose and implement a more effective concept. METHODS: An interdisciplinary (PC, oncology, radiotherapy, etc.) working group identified the need to (a) specify the timing of EI and (b) specify PC assignments by (c) providing more clear cut semantic and clinical definitions. As a result of repeated discussion in the different interdisciplinary working groups in charge of developing and consenting a once-yearly update of treatment guidelines [standard operating procedure (SOP)] for each malignancy, the need for disease-specific EI SOPs was identified. RESULTS: SOPs were developed for 19 malignancies (a) to identify a disease-specific point in each disease trajectory to initiate EI ("green flags") and to provide (b) a clear delineation and semantic differentiation of PC assignments ["palliative care" vs. "supportive" or "palliative therapies" ("green" vs. "red flags")]. DISCUSSION: To date, ASCO and WHO recommendations for EI lack detailed information about timing and infrastructure. The guidelines presented here aim to provide the missing information by reporting our developed and consented interdisciplinary guidelines for EI. CONCLUSION: With this concept, the authors provide a framework for realizing EI and hope to initiate a discussion about specific recommendations for EI.
Authors: Jan Gaertner; Rachel Wuerstlein; Christoph Ostgathe; Peter Mallmann; Nadia Harbeck; Raymond Voltz Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2011-06-03 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Jan Gaertner; Juergen Wolf; Dennis Scheicht; Sebastian Frechen; Ursula Klein; Martin Hellmich; Christoph Ostgathe; Michael Hallek; Raymond Voltz Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: M Hanson Frost; V J Suman; T A Rummans; A M Dose; M Taylor; P Novotny; R Johnson; R E Evans Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2000 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: David Hui; Ahmed Elsayem; Maxine De la Cruz; Ann Berger; Donna S Zhukovsky; Shana Palla; Avery Evans; Nada Fadul; J Lynn Palmer; Eduardo Bruera Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lissi Hansen; Karen S Lyons; Nathan F Dieckmann; Michael F Chang; Shirin Hiatt; Emma Solanki; Christopher S Lee Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Emanuela Scarpi; Monia Dall'Agata; Vittorina Zagonel; Teresa Gamucci; Raffaella Bertè; Elisabetta Sansoni; Elena Amaducci; Chiara Maria Broglia; Sara Alquati; Ferdinando Garetto; Stefania Schiavon; Silvia Quadrini; Elena Orlandi; Andrea Casadei Gardini; Silvia Ruscelli; Daris Ferrari; Maria Simona Pino; Roberto Bortolussi; Federica Negri; Silvia Stragliotto; Filomena Narducci; Martina Valgiusti; Alberto Farolfi; Oriana Nanni; Romina Rossi; Marco Maltoni Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Johannes Bükki; Julia Scherbel; Stephanie Stiel; Carsten Klein; Norbert Meidenbauer; Christoph Ostgathe Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: M Kalder; T Müller; D Fischer; A Müller; W Bader; M W Beckmann; C Brucker; C C Hack; V Hanf; A Hasenburg; A Hein; S Jud; M Kiechle; E Klein; D Paepke; A Rotmann; F Schütz; G Dobos; P Voiß; S Kümmel Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 2.915