| Literature DB >> 21431391 |
Mitesh Parekh1, Steven Swift, Nucelio Lemos, Mohsen Iskander, Bob Freeman, A S Arunkalaivanan, Alois Martan, Olanrewaju Sorinola, Diaa Rizk, Michael Halaska, Grzegorz Surkont, Carlos Medina, Jose Carlos Conceicao, Jeffrey E Korte.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-examiner agreement of a previously described simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification (S-POP) system in a multicenter, prospective, randomized, blinded fashion. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) system's use in daily practice is hampered due to perceived complexity and difficulty of use. The S-POP was introduced in order to make the POPQ user-friendly and increase its usage (Swift et al. in Int Urogynecol J 17(6):615-620, 2006).Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21431391 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-011-1395-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Urogynecol J ISSN: 0937-3462 Impact factor: 2.894