Literature DB >> 21431391

Multicenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system.

Mitesh Parekh1, Steven Swift, Nucelio Lemos, Mohsen Iskander, Bob Freeman, A S Arunkalaivanan, Alois Martan, Olanrewaju Sorinola, Diaa Rizk, Michael Halaska, Grzegorz Surkont, Carlos Medina, Jose Carlos Conceicao, Jeffrey E Korte.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-examiner agreement of a previously described simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification (S-POP) system in a multicenter, prospective, randomized, blinded fashion. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) system's use in daily practice is hampered due to perceived complexity and difficulty of use. The S-POP was introduced in order to make the POPQ user-friendly and increase its usage (Swift et al. in Int Urogynecol J 17(6):615-620, 2006).
METHODS: Five hundred eleven subjects underwent two separate pelvic exams in random order by two blinded examiners employing the S-POP at 12 centers around the world. Data were compared using weighted kappa statistics.
RESULTS: The weighted kappa statistics for the inter-examiner reliability of the S-POP were 0.87 for the overall stage, 0.89 and 0.81 for the anterior and posterior vaginal walls, 0.82 for the apex/cuff 0.89, and 0.84 for the cervix and vaginal fornix, respectively.
CONCLUSION: There is an almost perfect inter-examiner agreement of the S-POP system for the overall stage and each point within the system.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21431391     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-011-1395-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  16 in total

1.  Pelvic floor dysfunction management practice patterns: a survey of members of the International Urogynecological Association.

Authors:  G W Davila; G M Ghoniem; D S Kapoor; O Contreras-Ortiz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2002

2.  A PRACTICAL SYSTEM OF DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF PELVIC RELAXATIONS.

Authors:  R F PORGES
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1963-12

3.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS).

Authors:  W Auwad; R M Freeman; S Swift
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-05-18

5.  Validation of a simplified technique for using the POPQ pelvic organ prolapse classification system.

Authors:  Steven Swift; Sarah Morris; Vikki McKinnie; Robert Freeman; Eckhard Petri; Richard J Scotti; Peter Dwyer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-04-06

6.  Genesis of the vaginal profile: a correlated classification of vaginal relaxation.

Authors:  W F Baden; T A Walker
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 2.190

7.  Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system.

Authors:  A F Hall; J P Theofrastous; G W Cundiff; R L Harris; L F Hamilton; S E Swift; R C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care.

Authors:  S E Swift
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Interobserver variation in the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  W H Kobak; K Rosenberger; M D Walters
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1996

10.  Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects.

Authors:  Steven Swift; Patrick Woodman; Amy O'Boyle; Margie Kahn; Michael Valley; Deirdre Bland; Wei Wang; Joe Schaffer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  9 in total

1.  Center-by-center results of a multicenter prospective trial to determine the inter-observer correlation of the simplified POP-Q in describing pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  N Lemos; J E Korte; M Iskander; R Freeman; A Arunkalaivanan; D Rizk; M Halaska; C Medina; J C Conceição; M Parekh; A Martan; O Sorinola; E Wlazlak; Gamal Ghoniem; S Swift
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Christopher F Maher; Matthew D Barber; Sérgio Camargo; Vani Dandolu; Alex Digesu; Howard B Goldman; Martin Huser; Alfredo L Milani; Paul A Moran; Gabriel N Schaer; Mariëlla I J Withagen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Christopher F Maher; Matthew D Barber; Sérgio Camargo; Vani Dandolu; Alex Digesu; Howard B Goldman; Martin Huser; Alfredo L Milani; Paul A Moran; Gabriel N Schaer; Mariëlla I J Withagen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Posterior pelvic tilt is a risk factor for rectal prolapse: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  C Cantiani; D Sgamma; E Grossi; D Saccá; O R Meli; Q Lai; F Gaj
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Long-term outcomes and predictors of failure after surgery for stage IV apical pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Brian J Linder; Sherif A El-Nashar; Alain A Mukwege; Amy L Weaver; Michaela E McGree; Deborah J Rhodes; John B Gebhart; Christopher J Klingele; John A Occhino; Emanuel C Trabuco
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Efficacy and patient satisfaction of pelvic organ prolapse reduction using transvaginal mesh: A Canadian perspective.

Authors:  Mélanie Aubé; Marilyne Guérin; Caroline Rheaume; Le Mai Tu
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Sexual function after robot-assisted prolapse surgery: a prospective study.

Authors:  Femke van Zanten; Cherèl Brem; Egbert Lenters; Ivo A M J Broeders; Steven E Schraffordt Koops
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Systems in Clinical Staging of Iranian Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Zinat Ghanbari; Saloumeh Peivandi; Maryam Deldar Pasikhani; Foroohar Darabi
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2020-11

9.  Comparison of outcomes between pessary use and surgery for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: A prospective self-controlled study.

Authors:  Brian J Linder; John B Gebhart; Amy L Weaver; Felecia R Fick; Randina R Harvey-Springer; Emanuel C Trabuco; Christopher J Klingele; John A Occhino
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2022-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.