| Literature DB >> 21430873 |
Kabul C Saikia1, Tulsi D Bhattacharyya, Sanjeev K Bhuyan, Bikas Bordoloi, Bharat Durgia, Firoz Ahmed.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Giant cell tumor of bone (GCT) is a benign lesion with great propensity for local recurrence. This study aimed to analyse the rates of local recurrence and its possible predisposing factors in Campanacci's Grade III and II GCT of long bones following intralesional curettage and bone cementing.Entities:
Keywords: Bone cementing; GCT; recurrence
Year: 2011 PMID: 21430873 PMCID: PMC3051125 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.77138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Orthop ISSN: 0019-5413 Impact factor: 1.251
Clinical details of patients
| Age/sex (yrs) | Site | Grade of tumor (Campanacci’s) | Recurrence | Re-recurrence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22/M | D/F | III | - | - |
| 18/F | P/T | III | - | - |
| 31/M | D/F | III | + | - |
| 27/F | D/F | II | - | - |
| 40/M | P/T | III | - | - |
| 32/M | P/F | II | - | - |
| 38/F | D/F | III | + | + |
| 27/F | P/T | III | + | - |
| 39/M | D/F | II | - | - |
| 37/M | D/R | II | + | - |
| 29/F | P/T | III | - | - |
| 32/F | D/T | II | - | - |
| 35/M | P/T | III | + | - |
| 30/M | D/F | III | - | - |
| 36/M | D/R | II | - | - |
| 32/F | P/T | III | + | - |
| 28/M | P/T | III | - | - |
| 24/M | P/F | II | + | - |
| 32/F | D/F | III | - | - |
| 38/M | P/T | II | - | - |
| 36/F | D/T | III | + | - |
| 39/F | D/F | II | - | - |
| 27/M | P/T | III | - | - |
| 35/F | P/T | III | - | - |
| 39/F | P/T | II | + | + |
| 36/F | D/F | III | - | - |
| 28/M | D/R | II | - | - |
| 31/M | P/F | III | + | - |
| 37/F | P/T | II | - | - |
| 29/M | D/F | II | - | - |
| 34/M | P/T | II | - | - |
| 39/M | D/F | III | + | - |
D/F: Distal femur; P/F: Proximal femur; P/T: Proximal tibia; D/T: Distal tibia; D/R: Distal radius; F: Female; M: Male; yrs: years
Figure 1(a) X-ray (anteroposterior and lateral views) showing GCT of upper end of tibia, (b) intra-op photo showing (from above downwards) cavity after curettage, cancellous bone grafting, gel foam packing before cement application. (c) Post-operative X-ray (anteroposterior and lateral views) showing bone cement in situ
Clinical details of patients with recurrence
| Case no. | Time of recurrence (months) | Treatment of recurrence | Re-recurrence (months) | Treatment of recurrence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 05 | BC | - | - |
| 2. | 08 | BC | 9 | BC |
| 3. | 18 | BC | - | - |
| 4. | 12 | BC | - | - |
| 5. | 03 | Wide resection | - | - |
| 6. | 16 | BC | - | - |
| 7. | 28 | BC | - | - |
| 8. | 10 | Wide resection | - | - |
| 9. | 06 | BC | 16 | Wide resection |
| 10. | 34 | Wide resection | - | - |
| 11. | 14 | BC | - | - |
BC: Bone cementing
Figure 2X-rays (anteroposterior and oblique views) of wrist joint showing (a) Two-weeks postoperative X-ray showing bone cementing after curettage. (b) Recurrence after bone cementing at 12 months
Figure 3X-rays (anteroposterior, lateral views) of proximal both bones leg with knee joint showing recurrence at 28 months after initial refusal for surgery