Literature DB >> 21430035

The effect of manipulation of the programmed intermittent bolus time interval and injection volume on total drug use for labor epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial.

Cynthia A Wong1, Robert J McCarthy, Bradley Hewlett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Programmed intermittent bolus administration of epidural anesthetic solution compared with continuous infusion results in decreased anesthetic consumption and increased patient satisfaction. In this randomized and blinded study, we evaluated bupivacaine consumption and other analgesic outcomes when the programmed intermittent bolus time interval and volume were manipulated during the maintenance of epidural labor analgesia.
METHODS: Healthy, term, nulliparous women in spontaneous labor had combined spinal-epidural labor analgesia initiated with intrathecal bupivacaine 1.25 mg and fentanyl 15 μg, followed by an epidural test dose (lidocaine 45 mg with epinephrine 15 μg). Subjects were randomized to 1 of 3 programmed intermittent bolus dose regimens for maintenance of analgesia: 2.5 mL every 15 minutes (2.5/15), 5 mL every 30 minutes (5/30), or 10 mL every 60 minutes (10/60). The maintenance epidural solution consisted of bupivacaine 0.625 mg/mL with fentanyl 1.95 μg/mL. Breakthrough pain was treated initially with patient-administered epidural bolus doses, followed by manual boluses administered by the anesthesiologist if necessary. The primary outcome was total bupivacaine consumption per hour of labor. A linear mixed-effects model was used to model each patient's overall bupivacaine consumption per hour; the fixed effect was basal bupivacaine administration rate and the random effect was the area under the pain score versus time curve.
RESULTS: One hundred ninety women were studied. The median (interquartile range) adjusted bupivacaine consumption per hour of labor was 8.8 mg (8.0-9.7 mg) in group 10/60 compared with 10.0 mg (9.3-10.8 mg) in group 5/30 and 10.4 mg (9.6-11.2 mg) in group 2.5/15 (P = 0.005). There were no differences in area under the pain score versus time curve, pain scores at delivery, patient-controlled epidural analgesia requests or administrations, number of manual bolus doses for breakthrough pain, time to first patient-controlled epidural analgesia or manual bolus dose, or patient satisfaction with labor analgesia.
CONCLUSIONS: Extending the programmed intermittent bolus interval and volume from 15 minutes to 60 minutes, and 2.5 mL to 10 mL, respectively, decreased bupivacaine consumption without decreasing patient comfort or satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21430035     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820e7c2f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  12 in total

1.  [New aspects of obstetric anesthesia].

Authors:  T Girard; S Brugger; I Hösli
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  A retrospective comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for maintenance of labor analgesia.

Authors:  Michael Tien; Terrence K Allen; Amy Mauritz; Ashraf S Habib
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 2.580

Review 3.  [Recent standards in management of obstetric anesthesia].

Authors:  Maximiliaan van Erp; Clemens Ortner; Stefan Jochberger; Klaus Ulrich Klein
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2017-07-25

4.  Programmed Intermittent Epidural Boluses (PIEB) for Maintenance of Labor Analgesia: A Superior Technique and Easy to Implement.

Authors:  Allana Munro; Ronald B George
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-04-01

5.  Programmed Intermittent Epidural Boluses (PIEB) for Maintenance of Labor Analgesia: A Superior Technique to Continuous Epidural Infusion?

Authors:  Edward T Riley; Brendan Carvalho
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-04-01

6.  [Pain therapy in obstetrics].

Authors:  J Wallenborn; I Kühnert; D O Chebac; P Kranke
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 7.  A Review of the Impact of Obstetric Anesthesia on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Grace Lim; Francesca L Facco; Naveen Nathan; Jonathan H Waters; Cynthia A Wong; Holger K Eltzschig
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 8.  Modern Neuraxial Anesthesia for Labor and Delivery.

Authors:  Marie-Louise Meng; Richard Smiley
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-07-25

9.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Programmed Intermittent Bolus and Continuous Infusion as the Background Infusion for Parturient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia.

Authors:  Jiqian Xu; Jie Zhou; Hairong Xiao; Shangwen Pan; Jie Liu; You Shang; Shanglong Yao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The Efficacy of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Postoperative Analgesia after Open Gynecological Surgery: A Randomized Double-Blinded Study.

Authors:  Shiho Satomi; Nami Kakuta; Chiaki Murakami; Yoko Sakai; Katsuya Tanaka; Yasuo M Tsutsumi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.