Literature DB >> 21429945

Patient preferences for clinician interactional style in treatment of perinatal depression.

Erin J Henshaw1, Heather A Flynn, Joseph A Himle, Heather A O'Mahen, Jane Forman, Gina Fedock.   

Abstract

Most women with depression around the time of childbearing are not treated adequately, or at all. Clinical practice guidelines focus primarily on provision of information rather than on interaction factors. In this study, we explored clinician interactional style characteristics contributing to patient response to perinatal depression referral and treatment. Stratified purposeful sampling resulted in 23 participants selected by pregnancy, socioeconomic, and depression status. Participants completed semistructured interviews exploring their experiences with and preferences for clinician interactional style characteristics in the context of obstetrics-setting referral and delivery of depression treatment. Thematic analysis revealed a central theme related to interactional cues that influence women's reactions to clinical encounters, summarized by the question, "Can this person help me?" Women evaluated this question in four domains: feeling heard, developing trust in the clinician, perceiving technical competence in the clinician, and feeling that the intervention focus is effectively chosen and communicated. Our results imply that, in addition to informational factors, the way in which clinicians interact with patients about depression might strongly influence patient responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21429945     DOI: 10.1177/1049732311403499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  12 in total

1.  Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Grounded Theory Research.

Authors:  Claire Burke Draucker; Halima Al-Khattab; Dana D Hines; Jill Mazurczyk; Anne C Russell; Pam Shockey Stephenson; Shannon Draucker
Journal:  Qual Rep       Date:  2014-04-28

2.  Pregnant adolescent women's perceptions of depression and psychiatric services in the United States.

Authors:  Sarah E Bledsoe; Cynthia F Rizo; Traci L Wike; Candace Killian-Farrell; Julia Wessel; Anne-Marie O Bellows; Alison Doernberg
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Qualitative approaches to understanding patient preferences.

Authors:  Rachael Gooberman-Hill
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Patient's views on depression care in obstetric settings: how do they compare to the views of perinatal health care professionals?

Authors:  Nancy Byatt; Kathleen Biebel; Liz Friedman; Gifty Debordes-Jackson; Douglas Ziedonis; Lori Pbert
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.238

5.  Preparing heart and mind following prenatal diagnosis of complex congenital heart defect.

Authors:  Anne Chevalier McKechnie; Karen Pridham
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2012-08-27

6.  The impact of patient-provider communication and language spoken on adequacy of depression treatment for U.S. women.

Authors:  Abiola O Keller; Ronald Gangnon; Whitney P Witt
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2013-10-22

7.  Perinatal antidepressant use: understanding women's preferences and concerns.

Authors:  Cynthia L Battle; Amy L Salisbury; Casey A Schofield; Samia Ortiz-Hernandez
Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.325

8.  Early Impacts of Room to Grow: A Multifaceted Intervention Supporting Parents and Children Age Zero to Three.

Authors:  Christopher Wimer; Maria Marti; Jeanne Brooks-Gunn; Jane Waldfogel
Journal:  Child Youth Serv Rev       Date:  2021-04-30

9.  Adapting and testing a brief intervention to reduce maternal anxiety during pregnancy (ACORN): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Esther L Wilkinson; Heather A O'Mahen; Pasco Fearon; Sarah Halligan; Dorothy X King; Geva Greenfield; Jacqueline Dunkley-Bent; Jennifer Ericksen; Jeannette Milgrom; Paul G Ramchandani
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Pregnant Women's Perceptions of the Risks and Benefits of Disclosure During Web-Based Mental Health E-Screening Versus Paper-Based Screening: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Glenda MacQueen; Lydia Vermeyden; Dawn Kingston; Anne Biringer; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten; Rebecca Giallo; Sarah McDonald; Marie-Paule Austin
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2017-10-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.