Literature DB >> 21429804

Functional, cosmetic and psychosexual results in adult men who underwent hypospadias correction in childhood.

S P Rynja1, T P V M de Jong, J L H R Bosch, L M O de Kort.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Long-term results of hypospadias repair are scarce. Previous reviews mostly described mid-term results making extrapolation to long-term results difficult. This systematic review on long-term results in postpubertal men after hypospadias repair in childhood, aims to inform urologists and parents of a newborn boy with hypospadias about future expectations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Pubmed/Medline and Embase databases were searched until February 2010. Inclusion criteria stated that patients with hypospadias were operated before the age of 6 years and were older than 14 years at follow up. Results were pooled and analyzed using SPSS 16.0. Data on proximal hypospadias patients and controls are described separately.
RESULTS: Twenty eligible studies investigating micturition, cosmesis and psychosexual functioning were found. Hypospadias patients report more urinary symptoms and have a lower Qmax than controls. Patients are less satisfied with penile appearance compared to controls. Objectively assessed cosmetic results are good. Sexually, patients are as active as controls, but are less satisfied. Patients less often have an intimate relationships compared to controls.
CONCLUSION: Study outcomes were heterogeneous due to operation techniques and a lack of validated questionnaires and control groups. Long-term results of hypospadias patients should be measured in a prospective design using validated measurement tools.
Copyright © 2011 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21429804     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  30 in total

Review 1.  Current hypospadias management: Diagnosis, surgical management, and long-term patient-centred outcomes.

Authors:  Melise A Keays; Sumit Dave
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Foreskin reconstruction at the time of single-stage hypospadias repair: is it a safe procedure?

Authors:  Riccardo Manuele; Carlotta Senni; Kalpana Patil; Arash Taghizadeh; Massimo Garriboli
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  [Complications of hypospadias repairs].

Authors:  A Soave; S Riechardt; O Engel; M Rink; M Fisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  DSDs: genetics, underlying pathologies and psychosexual differentiation.

Authors:  Valerie A Arboleda; David E Sandberg; Eric Vilain
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 43.330

5.  Community engagement of adolescents in the development of a patient-centered outcome tool for adolescents with a history of hypospadias repair.

Authors:  K H Chan; J Panoch; A Carroll; S Downs; M P Cain; R Frankel; B Cockrum; C Moore; S Wiehe
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 1.830

Review 6.  Transitioning patients with hypospadias and other penile abnormalities to adulthood: What to expect?

Authors:  Keith Rourke; Luis H Braga
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Cosmetic and functional outcomes of two-stage hypospadias repair: an objective scoring evaluation and uroflowmetry.

Authors:  Naser S Hussein; Shapiee Bin Abd Samat; Mohd Arif Kor Abdullah; Mohd Nor Gohar
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-06

Review 8.  Meeting report on the NIDDK/AUA Workshop on Congenital Anomalies of External Genitalia: challenges and opportunities for translational research.

Authors:  H Scott Stadler; Craig A Peters; Renea M Sturm; Linda A Baker; Carolyn J M Best; Victoria Y Bird; Frank Geller; Deborah K Hoshizaki; Thomas B Knudsen; Jenna M Norton; Rodrigo L P Romao; Martin J Cohn
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 1.830

Review 9.  Failed hypospadias in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Marcello Cimador; Santiago Vallasciani; Gianantonio Manzoni; Waifro Rigamonti; Enrico De Grazia; Marco Castagnetti
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 10.  [Hypospadias : Insights and challenges].

Authors:  I Rübben; R Stein
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.