Literature DB >> 21427059

Short-time gene expression response to valproic acid and valproic acid analogs in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Måns Jergil1, Maud Forsberg, Hugh Salter, Kenneth Stockling, Anne-Lee Gustafson, Lennart Dencker, Michael Stigson.   

Abstract

Prediction of developmental toxicity in vitro could be based on short-time toxicogenomic endpoints in embryo-derived cell lines. Microarray studies in P19 mouse embryocarcinoma cells and mouse embryos have indicated that valproic acid (VPA), an inducer of neural tube defects, deregulates the expression of many genes, including those critically involved in neural tube development. In this study, we exposed undifferentiated R1 mouse embryonic stem cells to VPA and VPA analogs for 6 h and used CodeLink whole-genome expression microarrays to define VPA-responsive genes correlating with teratogenicity. Compared with the nonteratogenic analog 2-ethyl-4-methylpentanoic acid, VPA and the teratogenic VPA analog (S)-2-pentyl-4-pentynoic acid deregulated a much larger number of genes. Five genes (of ∼2500 array probes correlating with the separation) were sufficient to effectively separate teratogens from nonteratogens. A large fraction of the target genes correlating with teratogenicity are functionally related to embryonic development and morphogenesis, including neural tube formation and closure. Similar responses in R1 were found for most genes previously identified as VPA responsive in P19 and embryos. A subset of target genes was evaluated as candidate markers predictive of potential teratogenicity against a range of known teratogens using TaqMan expression arrays. These marker genes showed a positive predictive value for the teratogens butyrate and trichostatin A, which like VPA and (S)-2-pentyl-4-pentynoic acid are known histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors but not for compounds that are likely to act by other mechanisms. This indicates that HDAC inhibition may be a major mechanism by which VPA induces gene deregulation and possibly teratogenicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21427059     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  12 in total

1.  Effect of valproic acid on mitochondrial epigenetics.

Authors:  Hu Chen; Svetlana Dzitoyeva; Hari Manev
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 4.432

2.  Comparative modeling and virtual screening for the identification of novel inhibitors for myo-inositol-1-phosphate synthase.

Authors:  Syed Sikander Azam; Sara Sarfaraz; Asma Abro
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Mood stabilizing drugs regulate transcription of immune, neuronal and metabolic pathway genes in Drosophila.

Authors:  L Herteleer; L Zwarts; K Hens; D Forero; J Del-Favero; P Callaerts
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Epilepsy drugs and effects on fetal development: Potential mechanisms.

Authors:  Leila Etemad; Mohammad Moshiri; Seyed Adel Moallem
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.852

5.  Effects of the histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid on human pericytes in vitro.

Authors:  Jakob Karén; Alejandro Rodriguez; Tomas Friman; Lennart Dencker; Christian Sundberg; Birger Scholz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Chromatin remodeling, cell proliferation and cell death in valproic acid-treated HeLa cells.

Authors:  Marina Barreto Felisbino; Wirla M S C Tamashiro; Maria Luiza S Mello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The class I-specific HDAC inhibitor MS-275 modulates the differentiation potential of mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Gianluigi Franci; Laura Casalino; Francesca Petraglia; Marco Miceli; Roberta Menafra; Branka Radic; Valeria Tarallo; Monica Vitale; Marzia Scarfò; Gabriella Pocsfalvi; Alfonso Baldi; Concetta Ambrosino; Nicola Zambrano; Eduardo Patriarca; Sandro De Falco; Gabriella Minchiotti; Hendrik G Stunnenberg; Lucia Altucci
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.422

8.  From transient transcriptome responses to disturbed neurodevelopment: role of histone acetylation and methylation as epigenetic switch between reversible and irreversible drug effects.

Authors:  Nina V Balmer; Stefanie Klima; Eugen Rempel; Violeta N Ivanova; Raivo Kolde; Matthias K Weng; Kesavan Meganathan; Margit Henry; Agapios Sachinidis; Michael R Berthold; Jan G Hengstler; Jörg Rahnenführer; Tanja Waldmann; Marcel Leist
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  MicroRNA profiling as tool for in vitro developmental neurotoxicity testing: the case of sodium valproate.

Authors:  Lena Smirnova; Katharina Block; Alexandra Sittka; Michael Oelgeschläger; Andrea E M Seiler; Andreas Luch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Transcriptomic characterization of C57BL/6 mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation and its modulation by developmental toxicants.

Authors:  Xiugong Gao; Jeffrey J Yourick; Robert L Sprando
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.