| Literature DB >> 21425779 |
Pooja Arora1, Manjunatha M Venkataswamy, Andres Baena, Gabriel Bricard, Qian Li, Natacha Veerapen, Rachel Ndonye, Jeong Ju Park, Ji Hyung Lee, Kyung-Chang Seo, Amy R Howell, Young-Tae Chang, Petr A Illarionov, Gurdyal S Besra, Sung-Kee Chung, Steven A Porcelli.
Abstract
Structural variants of α-galactosylceramide (αGC) that activate invariant natural killer T cells (iNKT cells) are being developed as potential immunomodulatory agents for a variety of applications. Identification of specific forms of these glycolipids that bias responses to favor production of proinflammatory vs anti-inflammatory cytokines is central to current efforts, but this goal has been hampered by the lack of in vitro screening assays that reliably predict the in vivo biological activity of these compounds. Here we describe a fluorescence-based assay to identify functionally distinct αGC analogues. Our assay is based on recent findings showing that presentation of glycolipid antigens by CD1d molecules localized to plasma membrane detergent-resistant microdomains (lipid rafts) is correlated with induction of interferon-γ secretion and Th1-biased cytokine responses. Using an assay that measures lipid raft residency of CD1d molecules loaded with αGC, we screened a library of ∼200 synthetic αGC analogues and identified 19 agonists with potential Th1-biasing activity. Analysis of a subset of these novel candidate Th1 type agonists in vivo in mice confirmed their ability to induce systemic cytokine responses consistent with a Th1 type bias. These results demonstrate the predictive value of this novel in vitro assay for assessing the in vivo functionality of glycolipid agonists and provide the basis for a relatively simple high-throughput assay for identification and functional classification of iNKT cell activating glycolipids.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21425779 PMCID: PMC3072113 DOI: 10.1021/ja200070u
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Chem Soc ISSN: 0002-7863 Impact factor: 15.419
Figure 1Prototype αGC activators of iNKT cells and a schematic summarizing pathways for their loading onto and presentation by CD1d.
Figure 2Validation of the rapid in vitro fluorescent antibody staining assay to predict the functional activity of αGC analogues. (A) Plot of detergent extraction from JAWS II dendritic cells of CD1d/glycolipid complexes formed with known Th1- and Th2-biasing αGC agonists (i.e., compounds 1−3 in Figure 1). (B) In vivo serum IFNγ levels at various time points following administration of 4 nmol of αGC analogues. (C) Serum IL-4 secretion measured 2 h after injection of αGC analogues. (D) Ratio of the IFNγ level observed at 24 h with that of peak IL-4 secretion 2 h after glycolipid administration.
Figure 3Structures of predicted cytokine-biasing agonists. 4 was presented by Tx-100-extractable CD1d molecules and thus predicted to be a Th2-biasing agonist. In contrast, agonists 5−21 were presented by detergent-resistant (i.e., raft-localized) CD1d and were therefore identified as potential strong IFNγ inducers and Th1-biasing agonists.
Figure 4In vivo serum cytokine responses of selected αGC agonists. (A) Serum IL-4 and IFNγ at the indicated times after glycolipid injection were analyzed by ELISA. Results for 4 were compared with those for the seven other agonists using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnet correction. *, **, and *** indicate p < 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively. (B) Ratios of IFNγ observed 24 h after glycolipid injection to that for peak IL-4 at the 2 h time point.
Figure 5(A) Effect of saturated fatty acyl chain length on the extent of lipid raft localization. The percent lipid raft localization is plotted against the fatty acyl chain length of the αGC agonist. This shows a switch from lipid raft exclusion to lipid raft localization at a chain length of 16 carbons. (B) Comparison of the extent of lipid raft localization of CD1d loaded with 13 different Th1/Th0-biasing agonists vs Th2-biasing agonists 2 and 4. The value for 2 was compared with the values for the other agonists using one-way ANOVA with Dunnet correction.