Literature DB >> 21425387

Patients' perception of the usefulness of a question prompt sheet for advanced cancer patients when deciding the initial treatment: a randomized, controlled trial.

Yuki Shirai1, Maiko Fujimori, Asao Ogawa, Yu Yamada, Yutaka Nishiwaki, Atsushi Ohtsu, Yosuke Uchitomi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the patients' perception of the usefulness of a question prompt sheet (QPS) in facilitating the involvement of advanced cancer patients during consultation.
METHODS: Advanced cancer patients attending their first consultation after diagnosis were randomly assigned to the intervention group (received QPS and a hospital introduction sheet (HIS)) or the control group (received HIS only). Analysis was conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary outcome measure was patient rating of the usefulness of the material(s) (numerical rating scale of 0-10).
RESULTS: Sixty-three advanced cancer patients (72.4% response rate) were enrolled and analyzed. Nearly three-quarters of patients in both groups read the material(s) before consultation. The rated usefulness of the material(s) for asking questions of physicians was significantly higher in the intervention group than in controls (4.4 ± 3.6 and 2.7 ± 2.8, respectively; p = 0.033). The mean score of the usefulness of the material(s) for understanding the treatment plan tended to be higher in the intervention group than in the controls (4.9 ± 3.6 and 3.3 ± 2.8; p = 0.051). The mean score of willingness to use the material(s) in the future was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the controls (5.3 ± 3.8 and 2.8 ± 2.8; p = 0.006). There were no significant differences between the groups in the average total number of questions asked by patients (median, 1.0; interquartile range in both groups, 2.0).
CONCLUSIONS: QPS provided before oncology consultation may be useful for advanced cancer patients, on the other hand, it did not directly promote patient confidence to ask questions.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21425387     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  13 in total

1.  [Question prompt list for premedication consultation : Patient-oriented information on anesthesia].

Authors:  S Fischbeck; S Zimmer; R Laufenberg-Feldmann; W Laubach
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Effect of a Skills Training for Oncologists and a Patient Communication Aid on Shared Decision Making About Palliative Systemic Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Inge Henselmans; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Pomme van Maarschalkerweerd; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Dirkje W Sommeijer; Petronella B Ottevanger; Helle-Brit Fiebrich; Serge Dohmen; Geert-Jan Creemers; Filip Y F L de Vos; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-11-26

3.  Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Tomas Pantoja; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Nathalie Colomer; Carla Castañon; Javiera Leniz Martelli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-18

4.  Availability and effectiveness of decision aids for supporting shared decision making in patients with advanced colorectal and lung cancer: Results from a systematic review.

Authors:  Inge Spronk; Maartje C Meijers; Marianne J Heins; Anneke L Francke; Glyn Elwyn; Anne van Lindert; Sandra van Dulmen; Liesbeth M van Vliet
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.328

5.  Interventions to improve participation in health-care decisions in non-Western countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Hankiz Dolan; Mu Li; Lyndal Trevena
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Effect of a Skills Training for Oncologists and a Patient Communication Aid on Shared Decision Making About Palliative Systemic Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Inge Henselmans; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Pomme van Maarschalkerweerd; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Dirkje W Sommeijer; Petronella B Ottevanger; Helle-Brit Fiebrich; Serge Dohmen; Geert-Jan Creemers; Filip Y F L de Vos; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-11-26

7.  Beyond Oncology: Question Prompt Lists in Healthcare-A Scoping Review Protocol.

Authors:  Matthias Lukasczik; Christian Gerlich; Hans Dieter Wolf; Heiner Vogel
Journal:  Methods Protoc       Date:  2020-01-16

Review 8.  Living with Metastatic Cancer: A Roadmap for Future Research.

Authors:  Danielle B Tometich; Kelly A Hyland; Hatem Soliman; Heather S L Jim; Laura Oswald
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Electronic monitoring of symptoms and syndromes associated with cancer: methods of a randomized controlled trial SAKK 95/06 E-MOSAIC.

Authors:  David Blum; Dieter Koeberle; Karin Ribi; Shu-Fang Hsu Schmitz; Urs Utiger; Dirk Klingbiel; Florian Strasser
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Integrated communication support program for oncologists, caregivers and patients with rapidly progressing advanced cancer to promote patient-centered communication: J-SUPPORT 1904 study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Maiko Fujimori; Ayako Sato; Sayaka Jinno; Takuji Okusaka; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Masafumi Ikeda; Makoto Ueno; Masato Ozaka; Yukiko Takayama; Tempei Miyaji; Yoshiyuki Majima; Yosuke Uchitomi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.