INTRODUCTION: CME providers may be interested in identifying effective marketing strategies to direct users to specific content. Online advertisements for recruiting participants into activities such as clinical trials, public health programs, and continuing medical education (CME) have been effective in some but not all studies. The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of 2 marketing strategies in the context of an online CME cultural competence curriculum (www.c-comp.org). METHODS: In an interrupted time-series quasi-experimental design, 2 marketing strategies were tested: (1) wide dissemination to relevant organizations over a period of approximately 4 months, and (2) Internet paid search using Google Ads (5 consecutive 8-week periods--control 1, cultural/CME advertisement, control 2, hypertension/ content advertisement, control 3). Outcome measures were CME credit requests, Web traffic (visits per day, page views, pages viewed per visit), and cost. RESULTS: Overall, the site was visited 19,156 times and 78,160 pages were viewed. During the wide dissemination phase, the proportion of visits requesting CME credit decreased between the first (5.3%) and second (3.3%) halves of this phase (p = .04). During the Internet paid search phase, the proportion of visits requesting CME credit was highest during the cultural/CME advertisement period (control 1, 1.4%; cultural/CME ad, 4.3%; control 2, 1.5%; hypertension/content ad, 0.6%; control 3, 0.8%; p < .001). All measures of Web traffic changed during the Internet paid search phase (p < .01); however, changes were independent of the advertisement periods. The incremental cost for the cultural advertisement per CME credit requested was US $0.64. DISCUSSION: Internet advertisement focusing on cultural competence and CME was associated with about a threefold increase in requests for CME credit at an incremental cost of under US $1; however, Web traffic changes were independent of the advertisement strategy.
INTRODUCTION: CME providers may be interested in identifying effective marketing strategies to direct users to specific content. Online advertisements for recruiting participants into activities such as clinical trials, public health programs, and continuing medical education (CME) have been effective in some but not all studies. The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of 2 marketing strategies in the context of an online CME cultural competence curriculum (www.c-comp.org). METHODS: In an interrupted time-series quasi-experimental design, 2 marketing strategies were tested: (1) wide dissemination to relevant organizations over a period of approximately 4 months, and (2) Internet paid search using Google Ads (5 consecutive 8-week periods--control 1, cultural/CME advertisement, control 2, hypertension/ content advertisement, control 3). Outcome measures were CME credit requests, Web traffic (visits per day, page views, pages viewed per visit), and cost. RESULTS: Overall, the site was visited 19,156 times and 78,160 pages were viewed. During the wide dissemination phase, the proportion of visits requesting CME credit decreased between the first (5.3%) and second (3.3%) halves of this phase (p = .04). During the Internet paid search phase, the proportion of visits requesting CME credit was highest during the cultural/CME advertisement period (control 1, 1.4%; cultural/CME ad, 4.3%; control 2, 1.5%; hypertension/content ad, 0.6%; control 3, 0.8%; p < .001). All measures of Web traffic changed during the Internet paid search phase (p < .01); however, changes were independent of the advertisement periods. The incremental cost for the cultural advertisement per CME credit requested was US $0.64. DISCUSSION: Internet advertisement focusing on cultural competence and CME was associated with about a threefold increase in requests for CME credit at an incremental cost of under US $1; however, Web traffic changes were independent of the advertisement strategy.
Authors: Johan Thor; Jonas Lundberg; Jakob Ask; Jesper Olsson; Cheryl Carli; Karin Pukk Härenstam; Mats Brommels Journal: Qual Saf Health Care Date: 2007-10
Authors: Katie Crenshaw; Richard M Shewchuk; Haiyan Qu; Lisa J Staton; Judy Ann Bigby; Thomas K Houston; Jeroan Allison; Carlos A Estrada Journal: Acad Med Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Fred B Wood; Dennis Benson; Eve-Marie LaCroix; Elliot R Siegel; Susan Fariss Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2005-07-01 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Brian G Danaher; Shawn M Boles; Laura Akers; Judith S Gordon; Herbert H Severson Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2006-08-30 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Shawn M Kneipp; Jennifer Leeman; Pamela McCall; Kristen Hassmiller-Lich; Georgiy Bobashev; Todd A Schwartz; Robert Gilmore; Scott Riggan; Benjamin Gil Journal: ANS Adv Nurs Sci Date: 2015 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 1.824
Authors: Ray B Jones; Lesley Goldsmith; Paul Hewson; Maged N Kamel Boulos; Christopher J Williams Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2012-04-16 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Bethany M Kwan; Ross C Brownson; Russell E Glasgow; Elaine H Morrato; Douglas A Luke Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 21.870