Literature DB >> 21425272

Bed rest in pregnancy.

Catherine Bigelow1, Joanne Stone.   

Abstract

The use of bed rest in medicine dates back to Hippocrates, who first recommended bed rest as a restorative measure for pain. With the formalization of prenatal care in the early 1900s, maternal bed rest became a standard of care, especially toward the end of pregnancy. Antepartum bed rest is a common obstetric management tool, with up to 95% of obstetricians utilizing maternal activity restriction in some way in their practice. Bed rest is prescribed for a variety of complications of pregnancy, from threatened abortion and multiple gestations to preeclampsia and preterm labor. Although the use of bed rest is pervasive, there is a paucity of data to support its use. Additionally, many well-documented adverse physical, psychological, familial, societal, and financial effects have been discussed in the literature. There have been no complications of pregnancy for which the literature consistently demonstrates a benefit to antepartum bed rest. Given the well-documented adverse effects of bed rest, disruption of social relationships, and financial implications of this intervention, there is a real need for scientific investigation to establish whether this is an appropriate therapeutic modality. Well-designed randomized, controlled trials of bed rest versus normal activity for various complications of pregnancy are required to lay this debate to rest once and for all.
© 2011 Mount Sinai School of Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21425272     DOI: 10.1002/msj.20243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mt Sinai J Med        ISSN: 0027-2507


  5 in total

1.  Pravastatin improves pregnancy outcomes in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome refractory to antithrombotic therapy.

Authors:  Eleftheria Lefkou; Apostolos Mamopoulos; Themistoklis Dagklis; Christos Vosnakis; David Rousso; Guillermina Girardi
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Adherence to physical activity guidelines in mid-pregnancy does not reduce sedentary time: an observational study.

Authors:  Diana R Di Fabio; Courtney K Blomme; Katie M Smith; Gregory J Welk; Christina G Campbell
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 6.457

3.  Quantitative assessment of physical activity in pregnant women with sonographic short cervix and the risk for preterm delivery: A prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Roni Zemet; Eyal Schiff; Zipora Manovitch; Tal Cahan; Rakefet Yoeli-Ullman; Benny Brandt; Israel Hendler; Lilia Dorfman-Margolis; Yoav Yinon; Eyal Sivan; Shali Mazaki-Tovi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Well-being in high-risk pregnancy: an integrative review.

Authors:  Kobra Mirzakhani; Abbas Ebadi; Farhad Faridhosseini; Talaat Khadivzadeh
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Development and validation of the prenatal activity restriction stress questionnaire: a Rasch rating scale analysis.

Authors:  Hsiao-Ying Hung; Su-Pin Hung; Ying-Ju Chang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.