Literature DB >> 21425144

Expectant management versus immediate treatment for low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia : a randomized trial in Canada and Brazil.

Laurie Elit1, Mark N Levine, Jim A Julian, John W Sellors, Alice Lytwyn, Sylvia Chong, James B Mahony, Chushu Gu, Terri Finch, Luiz C Zeferino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal management strategy for women with low-grade biopsy-proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is not clear. Our objective was to compare the effectiveness of regular colposcopic follow-up and treatment of progressive disease only versus immediate treatment.
METHODS: Data were accrued between November 2000 and March 2006 for a noninferiority randomized clinical trial of 415 women with biopsy-proven grade 1 CIN from 8 Canadian and 2 Brazilian colposcopy clinics. Subjects were randomly assigned to either undergo immediate treatment with a loop electrical excision procedure (LEEP) or receive regular colposcopic follow-up for 18 months. The primary outcome was progression of disease to CIN 2 to 3 was based on histology obtained during 18 months of follow-up. Treatments were compared using differences of proportion with a 9% noninferiority margin. Analysis was conducted on the basis of intention-to-treat.
RESULTS: An initial LEEP was performed on 179 women. Disease progression was found in 32. Easily controlled vaginal bleeding occurred in 16 (8.9%). During follow-up, disease progression was identified in 3 (1.7%) women in the immediate treatment arm and 9 (4.4%) in the colposcopic follow-up arm-a tolerable difference of 2.7% with 1-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) upper limit of 6.0%. Compliance with all 3 follow-up visits was 61% overall, but significantly worse in women ≤30 years of age (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of progression to CIN grade 2 or 3 or cancer over 18 months was similar in the 2 treatment groups. In Canada and Brazil, follow-up for 18 months is a reasonable management strategy for women with persistent low-grade cytology who are found to have grade 1 CIN on referral for colposcopy and cervical biopsy.
Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21425144     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  4 in total

1.  Clinical features, treatment and outcomes of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia in a Chinese tertiary centre.

Authors:  L Chen; D Hu; S Xu; X Wang; Y Chen; W Lv; X Xie
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Immediate referral to colposcopy versus cytological surveillance for minor cervical cytological abnormalities in the absence of HPV test.

Authors:  Maria Kyrgiou; Ilkka E J Kalliala; Anita Mitra; Christina Fotopoulou; Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Margaret Cruickshank; Marc Arbyn; Evangelos Paraskevaidis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-01-26

3.  HPV 16 Is Related to the Progression of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2: A Case Series.

Authors:  Maria Gabriela Loffredo D'Ottaviano; Michelle Garcia Discacciati; Maria Antonieta Andreoli; Maria Cecília Costa; Lara Termini; Silvia H Rabelo-Santos; Luisa Lina Villa; Luiz Carlos Zeferino
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2013-12-04

4.  Incisal margin condition after LEEP for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia patients and prognosis.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Xiufeang Liu; Lina Xu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.447

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.