BACKGROUND: Standard indicators of quality of care have been developed in the United States. Limited information exists about quality of care in countries with universal health care coverage. OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of preventive care and care for cardiovascular risk factors in a country with universal health care coverage. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort of a random sample of 1,002 patients aged 50-80 years followed for 2 years from all Swiss university primary care settings. MAIN MEASURES: We used indicators derived from RAND's Quality Assessment Tools. Each indicator was scored by dividing the number of episodes when recommended care was delivered by the number of times patients were eligible for indicators. Aggregate scores were calculated by taking into account the number of eligible patients for each indicator. KEY RESULTS: Overall, patients (44% women) received 69% of recommended preventive care, but rates differed by indicators. Indicators assessing annual blood pressure and weight measurements (both 95%) were more likely to be met than indicators assessing smoking cessation counseling (72%), breast (40%) and colon cancer screening (35%; all p < 0.001 for comparisons with blood pressure and weight measurements). Eighty-three percent of patients received the recommended care for cardiovascular risk factors, including >75% for hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes. However, foot examination was performed only in 50% of patients with diabetes. Prevention indicators were more likely to be met in men (72.2% vs 65.3% in women, p < 0.001) and patients <65 years (70.1% vs 68.0% in those ≥ 65 years, p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Using standardized tools, these adults received 69% of recommended preventive care and 83% of care for cardiovascular risk factors in Switzerland, a country with universal coverage. Prevention indicator rates were lower for women and the elderly, and for cancer screening. Our study helps pave the way for targeted quality improvement initiatives and broader assessment of health care in Continental Europe.
BACKGROUND: Standard indicators of quality of care have been developed in the United States. Limited information exists about quality of care in countries with universal health care coverage. OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of preventive care and care for cardiovascular risk factors in a country with universal health care coverage. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort of a random sample of 1,002 patients aged 50-80 years followed for 2 years from all Swiss university primary care settings. MAIN MEASURES: We used indicators derived from RAND's Quality Assessment Tools. Each indicator was scored by dividing the number of episodes when recommended care was delivered by the number of times patients were eligible for indicators. Aggregate scores were calculated by taking into account the number of eligible patients for each indicator. KEY RESULTS: Overall, patients (44% women) received 69% of recommended preventive care, but rates differed by indicators. Indicators assessing annual blood pressure and weight measurements (both 95%) were more likely to be met than indicators assessing smoking cessation counseling (72%), breast (40%) and colon cancer screening (35%; all p < 0.001 for comparisons with blood pressure and weight measurements). Eighty-three percent of patients received the recommended care for cardiovascular risk factors, including >75% for hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes. However, foot examination was performed only in 50% of patients with diabetes. Prevention indicators were more likely to be met in men (72.2% vs 65.3% in women, p < 0.001) and patients <65 years (70.1% vs 68.0% in those ≥ 65 years, p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Using standardized tools, these adults received 69% of recommended preventive care and 83% of care for cardiovascular risk factors in Switzerland, a country with universal coverage. Prevention indicator rates were lower for women and the elderly, and for cancer screening. Our study helps pave the way for targeted quality improvement initiatives and broader assessment of health care in Continental Europe.
Authors: Elizabeth A McGlynn; Steven M Asch; John Adams; Joan Keesey; Jennifer Hicks; Alison DeCristofaro; Eve A Kerr Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-06-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jörg Muntwyler; Giorgio Noseda; Roger Darioli; Christiane Gruner; Felix Gutzwiller; Ferenc Follath Journal: Swiss Med Wkly Date: 2003-02-08 Impact factor: 2.193
Authors: Eve A Kerr; Dylan M Smith; Mary M Hogan; Timothy P Hofer; Sarah L Krein; Martin Bermann; Rodney A Hayward Journal: Med Care Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-05-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Katharina Wolf-Maier; Richard S Cooper; Holly Kramer; José R Banegas; Simona Giampaoli; Michel R Joffres; Neil Poulter; Paola Primatesta; Birgitta Stegmayr; Michael Thamm Journal: Hypertension Date: 2003-11-24 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Sven Streit; Bruno R da Costa; Douglas C Bauer; Tinh-Hai Collet; Stefan Weiler; Lukas Zimmerli; Peter Frey; Jacques Cornuz; Jean-Michel Gaspoz; Edouard Battegay; Eve Kerr; Drahomir Aujesky; Nicolas Rodondi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Stefan Weiler; Armin Gemperli; Tinh-Hai Collet; Douglas C Bauer; Lukas Zimmerli; Jacques Cornuz; Edouard Battegay; Jean-Michel Gaspoz; Eve A Kerr; Drahomir Aujesky; Nicolas Rodondi Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Paul Sebo; Hubert Maisonneuve; Bernard Cerutti; Jean-Pascal Fournier; Nicolas Senn; Cédric Rat; Dagmar M Haller Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-09-05 Impact factor: 3.240