OBJECT: To propose the determination of the macromolecular baseline (MMBL) in clinical 1H MR spectra based on T(1) and T(2) differentiation using 2D fitting in FiTAID, a general Fitting Tool for Arrays of Interrelated Datasets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Series of localized inversion-recovery (IR) and 2DJ separation spectra of the brain were recorded at 3T. The MMBL was determined by three 2D evaluation methods based on (1) IR spectra only, (2) 2DJ spectra only, (3) both IR and 2DJ spectra (2DJ-IR). Their performance was compared using synthetic spectra and based on variability and reproducibility as obtained in vivo from 12 subjects in 20 examinations. RESULTS: All methods performed well for synthetic data. In vivo, 2DJ-only yielded larger variations than the other methods. IR-only and 2DJ-IR yielded similar performance. FiTAID is illustrated with further applications where linear-combination model fitting of interrelated arrays of spectra is advantageous. CONCLUSION: 2D-Fitting offers the possibility to determine the MMBL based on a range of complementary experimental spectra not relying on smoothness criteria or global assumptions on T(1). Since 2DJ-IR includes information from spectra with different inversion and echo times, it is expected to be more robust in cases with more variable data quality and overlap with lipid resonances.
OBJECT: To propose the determination of the macromolecular baseline (MMBL) in clinical 1H MR spectra based on T(1) and T(2) differentiation using 2D fitting in FiTAID, a general Fitting Tool for Arrays of Interrelated Datasets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Series of localized inversion-recovery (IR) and 2DJ separation spectra of the brain were recorded at 3T. The MMBL was determined by three 2D evaluation methods based on (1) IR spectra only, (2) 2DJ spectra only, (3) both IR and 2DJ spectra (2DJ-IR). Their performance was compared using synthetic spectra and based on variability and reproducibility as obtained in vivo from 12 subjects in 20 examinations. RESULTS: All methods performed well for synthetic data. In vivo, 2DJ-only yielded larger variations than the other methods. IR-only and 2DJ-IR yielded similar performance. FiTAID is illustrated with further applications where linear-combination model fitting of interrelated arrays of spectra is advantageous. CONCLUSION: 2D-Fitting offers the possibility to determine the MMBL based on a range of complementary experimental spectra not relying on smoothness criteria or global assumptions on T(1). Since 2DJ-IR includes information from spectra with different inversion and echo times, it is expected to be more robust in cases with more variable data quality and overlap with lipid resonances.
Authors: Clemens Elster; Florian Schubert; Alfred Link; Monika Walzel; Frank Seifert; Herbert Rinneberg Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Weiqiang Dou; Oliver Speck; Thomas Benner; Jörn Kaufmann; Meng Li; Kai Zhong; Martin Walter Journal: MAGMA Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Victor Adalid; André Döring; Sreenath Pruthviraj Kyathanahally; Christine Sandra Bolliger; Chris Boesch; Roland Kreis Journal: MAGMA Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Karim Snoussi; Joseph S Gillen; Alena Horska; Nicolaas A J Puts; Subechhya Pradhan; Richard A E Edden; Peter B Barker Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Philipp Moser; Lukas Hingerl; Bernhard Strasser; Michal Považan; Gilbert Hangel; Ovidiu C Andronesi; Andre van der Kouwe; Stephan Gruber; Siegfried Trattnig; Wolfgang Bogner Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jamie Near; Ashley D Harris; Christoph Juchem; Roland Kreis; Małgorzata Marjańska; Gülin Öz; Johannes Slotboom; Martin Wilson; Charles Gasparovic Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 4.044