| Literature DB >> 21424213 |
Ferdinand I Broekema1, Wim van Oeveren, Johan Zuidema, Susan H Visscher, Rudolf R M Bos.
Abstract
Topical hemostatic agents can be used to treat problematic bleedings in patients who undergo surgery. Widely used are the collagen- and gelatin-based hemostats. This study aimed to develop a fully synthetic, biodegradable hemostatic agent to avoid exposure to animal antigens. In this in vitro study the suitability of different newly developed polyurethane-based foams as a hemostatic agent has been evaluated and compared to commonly used agents. An experimental in vitro test model was used in which human blood flowed through the test material. Different modified polyurethane foams were compared to collagen and gelatin. The best coagulation was achieved with collagen. The results of the polyurethane foam improved significantly by increasing the amount of polyethylene glycol. Therefore, the increase of the PEG concentration seems a promising approach. Additional in vivo studies will have to be implemented to assess the application of polyurethane foam as a topical hemostatic agent.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21424213 PMCID: PMC3085060 DOI: 10.1007/s10856-011-4276-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med ISSN: 0957-4530 Impact factor: 3.896
Overview of the added substances to the PU foams
| PEG concentration of PU foam (wt%) | Added substance or treatment | Number of treated foams |
|---|---|---|
| 40 | Recombinant FVIIa (0.1 mg/ml) | 30 |
| 40 | Phospholipid solution (100 mg/ml) | 20 |
| 40 | Adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (0.085 mg/ml) | 20 |
| 40 | Bovine thrombin (100 NIH U/ml) | 10 |
| 55 | Recombinant FVIIa (0.1 mg/ml) | 25 |
| 40 | Saline (0.9% NaCl) | 10 |
| 40 | Plasma glow discharge | 30 |
Fig. 1In vitro test model. Suction of human whole blood was performed with a constant pressure of −40 mbar. Ø, diameter
Mean deceleration and standard deviation of the different materials
| Material | Mean deceleration (μl/s2) | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Collagen | 0.036 | 0.022 |
| Gelatin | 0.021 | 0.016 |
| PU (55% PEG) | 0.015 | 0.007 |
| PU (55% PEG) + rFVIIa | 0.015 | 0.006 |
| PU + glow discharge | 0.012 | 0.011 |
| PU + thrombin | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| PU + saline | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| PU (40% PEG) + rFVIIa | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| PU (40% PEG) | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| No material | −0.001 | 0.009 |
| PU + ADP | −0.002 | 0.015 |
| PU + PL | −0.003 | 0.015 |
PU polyurethane; PEG polyethylene glycol; rFVIIa recombinant factor VIIa; ADP adenosine diphosphate; PL phospholipids
Fig. 2Schematic representation of decelerations for the different test materials. The number of tested samples (n) is noted. PU polyurethane; PEG polyethylene glycol; rFVIIa recombinant factor VIIa. For each group, the line in the middle of the box represents the median. The lower and the upper edges of the box are the 1st and 3rd quartile, respectively. The fences are drawn to the nearest value not exceeding 1.5 (interquartile range). *P < 0.001 compared with control group (No Material)
Fig. 3Schematic representation of decelerations for the different modified PU foams (40% PEG). The number of tested samples (n) is noted. The results of collagen have been added to this boxplot as a reference. PU polyurethane; PL phospholipids; ADP adenosine diphosphate; GD glow discharge. For each group, the line in the middle of the box represents the median. The lower and the upper edges of the box are the 1st and 3rd quartile, respectively. The fences are drawn to the nearest value not exceeding 1.5 (interquartile range). *P < 0.001 compared with control group (No Material). **P < 0.05 compared with control group (No Material)
Thrombin-antithrombin complexes in the different blood samples
| Blood sample | TAT (mg/L) | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Before testing | 1.38 | 0.06 |
| After PU | 1.36 | 0.07 |
| After PU + rFVIIa | 2.40 | 0.12 |
PU polyurethane; rFVIIa recombinant factor VIIa