Literature DB >> 21424192

Pelvic dimensions as a predictor of difficulty in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Takashi Akiyoshi, Toshiaki Watanabe, Masashi Ueno.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21424192     DOI： 10.1007/s00464-011-1649-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN： 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance (MR) pelvimetry as a predictor of difficulty in laparoscopic operations for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Tim Killeen; Saswata Banerjee; Vardhini Vijay; Zaid Al-Dabbagh; Daren Francis; Steve Warren
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sung-Bum Kang; Ji Won Park; Seung-Yong Jeong; Byung Ho Nam; Hyo Seong Choi; Duck-Woo Kim; Seok-Byung Lim; Taek-Gu Lee; Dae Yong Kim; Jae-Sung Kim; Hee Jin Chang; Hye-Seung Lee; Sun Young Kim; Kyung Hae Jung; Yong Sang Hong; Jee Hyun Kim; Dae Kyung Sohn; Dae-Hyun Kim; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masatoshi Oya; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Meiki Fukuda; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Masashi Ueno; Satoshi Miyata; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 5.  Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a review.

Authors:  Jensen T C Poon; Wai Lun Law
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection with double-stapling technique anastomosis: safe and feasible for lower rectal cancer?

Authors:  Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Takashi Akiyoshi; Masatoshi Oya; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Masashi Ueno; Toshiharu Yamaguchi; Tetsuichiro Muto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584
  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  CT/MRI pelvimetry as a useful tool when selecting patients with rectal cancer for transanal total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Alexander Ferko; Ondřej Malý; Július Örhalmi; Josef Dolejš
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for lower rectal cancer: the impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Akio Shiomi; Yusuke Kinugasa; Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Hiroyasu Kagawa; Yushi Yamakawa
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Magnetic resonance-based pelvimetry and tumor volumetry can predict surgical difficulty and oncologic outcome in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Gulsen Atasoy; Naciye Cigdem Arslan; Funda Dinc Elibol; Ozgul Sagol; Funda Obuz; Selman Sokmen
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Factors affecting operating time in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Chu Wang; Yi Xiao; Huizhong Qiu; Jie Yao; Weidong Pan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.754
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.