Literature DB >> 21423829

Correlation versus prediction in children's word learning: Cross-linguistic evidence and simulations.

Eliana Colunga1, Linda B Smith, Michael Gasser.   

Abstract

The ontological distinction between discrete individuated objects and continuous substances, and the way this distinction is expressed in different languages has been a fertile area for examining the relation between language and thought. In this paper we combine simulations and a cross-linguistic word learning task as a way to gain insight into the nature of the learning mechanisms involved in word learning. First, we look at the effect of the different correlational structures on novel generalizations with two kinds of learning tasks implemented in neural networks-prediction and correlation. Second, we look at English- and Spanish-speaking 2-3-year-olds' novel noun generalizations, and find that count/mass syntax has a stronger effect on Spanish- than on English-speaking children's novel noun generalizations, consistent with the predicting networks. The results suggest that it is not just the correlational structure of different linguistic cues that will determine how they are learned, but the specific learning mechanism and task in which they are involved.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21423829      PMCID: PMC3058523          DOI: 10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn        ISSN: 1866-9808


  17 in total

1.  Counting nouns and verbs in the input: differential frequencies, different kinds of learning?

Authors:  C M Sandhofer; L B Smith; J Luo
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2000-10

2.  Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning.

Authors:  Bradley C Love
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

3.  Understanding how input matters: verb learning and the footprint of universal grammar.

Authors:  Jeffrey Lidz; Henry Gleitman; Lila Gleitman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-04

4.  From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: a role for associative learning.

Authors:  Eliana Colunga; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Blocking in category learning.

Authors:  Lewis Bott; Aaron B Hoffman; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

6.  Dynamic self-organization and early lexical development in children.

Authors:  Ping Li; Xiaowei Zhao; Brian Mac Whinney
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-07-08

7.  Language-relative construal of individuation constrained by universal ontology: revisiting language universals and linguistic relativity.

Authors:  Mutsumi Imai; Reiko Mazuka
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-05-06

8.  Unsupervised concept learning and value systematicity: a complex whole aids learning the parts.

Authors:  Dorrit Billman; James Knutson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 9.  Dyslexic and category-specific aphasic impairments in a self-organizing feature map model of the lexicon.

Authors:  R Mikkulainen
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  The intentionality model and language acquisition: engagement, effort, and the essential tension in development.

Authors:  L Bloom; E Tinker
Journal:  Monogr Soc Res Child Dev       Date:  2001
View more
  6 in total

1.  Not Only Size Matters: Early-Talker and Late-Talker Vocabularies Support Different Word-Learning Biases in Babies and Networks.

Authors:  Eliana Colunga; Clare E Sims
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-11-21

2.  Set size, individuation, and attention to shape.

Authors:  Lisa Cantrell; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-17

Review 3.  Knowledge as process: contextually-cued attention and early word learning.

Authors:  Linda B Smith; Eliana Colunga; Hanako Yoshida
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-09

4.  Modeling cross-situational word-referent learning: prior questions.

Authors:  Chen Yu; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Bilingual and monolingual children attend to different cues when learning new words.

Authors:  Chandra L Brojde; Sabeen Ahmed; Eliana Colunga
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-05-25

6.  Of mice and men: Speech sound acquisition as discriminative learning from prediction error, not just statistical tracking.

Authors:  Jessie S Nixon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-01-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.