| Literature DB >> 21423692 |
Hiroshi Oka1, Hirozo Goto, Keiichi Koizumi, Shin Nakamura, Koichi Tsuneyama, Yue Zhou, Michiko Jo, Takako Fujimoto, Hiroaki Sakurai, Naotoshi Shibahara, Ikuo Saiki, Yutaka Shimada.
Abstract
In chronic renal failure, hypoxia of renal tissue is thought to be the common final pathway leading to end-stage renal failure. In this study the effects of hachimijiogan, a Kampo formula, were studied with respect to hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF). Using remnant kidney rats, we studied the effects of hachimijiogan on renal function in comparison with angiotensin II receptor blocker. The result showed that oral administration of hachimijiogan for seven days suppressed urinary protein excretion and urinary 8-OHdG, a marker of antioxidant activity, equally as well as oral administration of candesartan cilexetil. In contrast, the protein volume of HIF-1α in the renal cortex was not increased in the candesartan cilexetil group, but that in the hachimijiogan group was increased. In immunohistochemical studies as well, the expression of HIF-1α of the high-dose hachimijiogan group increased compared to that of the control group. Vascular endothelial growth factor and glucose transporter 1, target genes of HIF-1α, were also increased in the hachimijiogan group. These results suggest that hachimijiogan produces a protective effect by a mechanism different from that of candesartan cilexetil.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21423692 PMCID: PMC3057497 DOI: 10.1155/2011/348686
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Chemical profile of hachimijiogan analyzed by three-dimensional HPLC.
Sequences for RT-PCR primers.
| Genes | Forward | Reverse |
|---|---|---|
|
| GCCAACCGTGAAAAGATGAC | AGGCATACAGGGACAACACA |
| VEGF | TTACTGCTGTACCTCCAC | ACAGGACGGCTTGAAGATA [ |
| Glut-1 | AGGTGTTCGGCTTAGACTC | GAAGGGCAACAGGATACAC |
VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor, Glut-1: glucose transporter 1.
Physiological data of experimental animals.
| Group | Body weight (g) | Kidney weight (g/100g BW) | Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | Urine volume (mL/day) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Final | Baseline | Final | Baseline | Final | Baseline | Final | ||
| Sham | 297.1 ± 11.0 | 325.5 ± 12.0 | 0.311 ± 0.04 | 121.4 ± 14.2 | 113.7 ± 10.8 | 56.4 ± 13.5 | 62.6 ± 16.2 | 5.7 ± 3.1 | 6.4 ± 2.8 |
| Control | 261.7 ± 22.9 | 291.6 ± 26.4* | 0.331 ± 0.05 | 124.3 ± 5.8 | 127.7 ± 8.2 | 69.7 ± 6.7 | 59.1 ± 12.2 | 20.3 ± 6.6** | 21.1 ± 6.1** |
| LD-HJG | 253.6 ± 17.6 | 275.9 ± 24.3* | 0.341 ± 0.03 | 132.9 ± 27.1 | 130.0 ± 17.2 | 74.2 ± 19.1 | 62.8 ± 16.2 | 17.6 ± 6.7** | 14.1 ± 6.3** |
| HD-HJG | 257.5 ± 16.6 | 295.6 ± 16.4* | 0.354 ± 0.04 | 122.8 ± 15.6 | 126.3 ± 8.9 | 70.1 ± 17.3 | 56.9 ± 6.1 | 20.6 ± 8.3** | 18.0 ± 7.1** |
| Candesartan | 264.3 ± 14.6 | 276.1 ± 16.6* | 0.343 ± 0.03 | 121.4 ± 14.6 | 119.7 ± 16.2 | 70.9 ± 15.8 | 58.5 ± 13.1 | 20.2 ± 13.4** | 16.5 ± 12.8** |
LD-HJG: low-dose hachimijiogan; HD-HJG: high-dose hachimijiogan.
Baseline: before drug administration; Final: after 1 week of drug administration.
Data represent mean ± S.D. ( n = 8–10). *P < .05, **P < .01 versus sham group.
Effect of hachimijiogan on renal functional parameters.
| s-Alb (mg/dL) | BUN (mg/dL) | s-Cre (mg/dL) | u-Pro (mg/day) | Ccr (mL/min/kg BW) | 8-OHdG (ng/day) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | 834.8 ± 110.9 | 15.6 ± 1.9 | 0.32 ± 0.14 | 13.01 ± 7.29 | 5.03 ± 3.07 | 325.9 ± 106.5 |
| Control | 887.1 ± 67.4 | 50.6 ± 36.7** | 1.44 ± 1.32** | 35.34 ± 20.62** | 1.88 ± 0.94** | 840.4 ± 252.4** |
| LD-HJG | 895.8 ± 25.7 | 42.0 ± 27.1* | 0.93 ± 0.59 | 25.15 ± 15.32 | 2.13 ± 1.40** | 582.9 ± 201.8# |
| HD-HJG | 833.9 ± 82.2 | 39.6 ± 25.7 | 0.87 ± 0.61 | 19.73 ± 5.41# | 2.11 ± 0.86** | 550.9 ± 210.5# |
| Candesartan | 840.8 ± 92.5 | 33.8 ± 12.3 | 0.88 ± 0.49 | 15.41 ± 5.92## | 1.65 ± 0.64** | 484.2 ± 171.3## |
LD-HJG: low-dose hachimijiogan; HD-HJG: high-dose hachimijiogan.
Data represent mean ± S.D. (n = 8–10).
*P < .05, **P < .01 versus sham group.
# P < .05, ## P < .01 versus control group.
Figure 2Measurement of renal cortical hypoxia-related factors in remnant kidney treated with hachimijiogan. The volume of HIF-1α protein of the four 5/6Nx groups increased significantly compared to that of the sham group, and that of the high-dose hachimijiogan group increased significantly compared to that of the control group (a). The mRNA levels of VEGF and Glut-1 of the high-dose hachimijiogan group increased significantly compared to those of the sham and control groups (b, c). (a) HIF-1α protein, (b) VEGF mRNA, (c) Glut-1 mRNA, LD-HJG: low-dose hachimijiogan, HD-HJG: high-dose hachimijiogan. Data represent mean ± S.D. (n = 8–10). *P < .05, **P < .01 versus sham group, # P < .05, ## P < .01 versus control group.
Figure 3Immunohistochemical studies showed that the expression of HIF-1α of the high-dose hachimijiogan group increased compared to that of the control group (a–e). The black arrow indicates an HIF-1α-positive cell stained brown, and the white arrow indicates an HIF-1α-negative cell stained blue. The number of HIF-1α-positive cells in the high-dose hachimijiogan group increased significantly compared to that in the control group. (a) sham, (b) control, (c) low-dose hachimijiogan, (d) high-dose hachimijiogan, (e) candesartan cilexetil. (magnification 400x, scale bar: 100 μm), (f) Comparison with percentage of HIF-1α-positive cells/field in the every group. Data represent mean ± S.D. *P < .05, **P < .01 versus sham group, ## P < .01 versus control group.
Figure 4Hypothetical representation of the effects of hachimijiogan on renal dysfunction.