Literature DB >> 21423564

Methods for estimation of radiation risk in epidemiological studies accounting for classical and Berkson errors in doses.

Alexander Kukush1, Sergiy Shklyar, Sergii Masiuk, Illya Likhtarov, Lina Kovgan, Raymond J Carroll, Andre Bouville.   

Abstract

With a binary response Y, the dose-response model under consideration is logistic in flavor with pr(Y=1 | D) = R (1+R)(-1), R = λ(0) + EAR D, where λ(0) is the baseline incidence rate and EAR is the excess absolute risk per gray. The calculated thyroid dose of a person i is expressed as Dimes=fiQi(mes)/Mi(mes). Here, Qi(mes) is the measured content of radioiodine in the thyroid gland of person i at time t(mes), Mi(mes) is the estimate of the thyroid mass, and f(i) is the normalizing multiplier. The Q(i) and M(i) are measured with multiplicative errors Vi(Q) and ViM, so that Qi(mes)=Qi(tr)Vi(Q) (this is classical measurement error model) and Mi(tr)=Mi(mes)Vi(M) (this is Berkson measurement error model). Here, Qi(tr) is the true content of radioactivity in the thyroid gland, and Mi(tr) is the true value of the thyroid mass. The error in f(i) is much smaller than the errors in ( Qi(mes), Mi(mes)) and ignored in the analysis. By means of Parametric Full Maximum Likelihood and Regression Calibration (under the assumption that the data set of true doses has lognormal distribution), Nonparametric Full Maximum Likelihood, Nonparametric Regression Calibration, and by properly tuned SIMEX method we study the influence of measurement errors in thyroid dose on the estimates of λ(0) and EAR. The simulation study is presented based on a real sample from the epidemiological studies. The doses were reconstructed in the framework of the Ukrainian-American project on the investigation of Post-Chernobyl thyroid cancers in Ukraine, and the underlying subpolulation was artificially enlarged in order to increase the statistical power. The true risk parameters were given by the values to earlier epidemiological studies, and then the binary response was simulated according to the dose-response model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Berkson measurement error; Chornobyl accident; SIMEX estimator; classical measurement error; estimation of radiation risk; full maximum likelihood estimating procedure; regression calibration; uncertainties in thyroid dose

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21423564      PMCID: PMC3058406          DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biostat        ISSN: 1557-4679            Impact factor:   0.968


  14 in total

1.  Semiparametric regression modeling with mixtures of Berkson and classical error, with application to fallout from the Nevada test site.

Authors:  Bani Mallick; F Owen Hoffman; Raymond J Carrol
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Power and uncertainty analysis of epidemiological studies of radiation-related disease risk in which dose estimates are based on a complex dosimetry system: some observations.

Authors:  Daniel O Stram; Kenneth J Kopecky
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Thyroid cancer risk in areas of Ukraine and Belarus affected by the Chernobyl accident.

Authors:  P Jacob; T I Bogdanova; E Buglova; M Chepurniy; Y Demidchik; Y Gavrilin; J Kenigsberg; R Meckbach; C Schotola; S Shinkarev; M D Tronko; A Ulanovsky; S Vavilov; L Walsh
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Childhood thyroid cancer, radiation dose from Chernobyl, and dose uncertainties in Bryansk Oblast, Russia: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Kenneth J Kopecky; Valery Stepanenko; Nikolai Rivkind; Paul Voillequé; Lynn Onstad; Vladimir Shakhtarin; Evgeni Parshkov; Sergei Kulikov; Evgeni Lushnikov; Alexander Abrosimov; Vladislav Troshin; Galina Romanova; Vladimir Doroschenko; Anatoli Proshin; Anatoly Tsyb; Scott Davis
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  How to account for uncertainty due to measurement errors in an uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Eduard Hofer
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  A cohort study of thyroid cancer and other thyroid diseases after the chornobyl accident: thyroid cancer in Ukraine detected during first screening.

Authors:  Mykola D Tronko; Geoffrey R Howe; Tetyana I Bogdanova; Andre C Bouville; Ovsiy V Epstein; Aaron B Brill; Illya A Likhtarev; Daniel J Fink; Valentyn V Markov; Ellen Greenebaum; Valery A Olijnyk; Ihor J Masnyk; Victor M Shpak; Robert J McConnell; Valery P Tereshchenko; Jacob Robbins; Oleksandr V Zvinchuk; Lydia B Zablotska; Maureen Hatch; Nickolas K Luckyanov; Elaine Ron; Terry L Thomas; Paul G Voillequé; Gilbert W Beebe
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Some aspects of measurement error in explanatory variables for continuous and binary regression models.

Authors:  G K Reeves; D R Cox; S C Darby; E Whitley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Post-Chernobyl thyroid cancers in Ukraine. Report 2: risk analysis.

Authors:  I Likhtarov; L Kovgan; S Vavilov; M Chepurny; E Ron; J Lubin; A Bouville; N Tronko; T Bogdanova; L Gulak; L Zablotska; G Howe
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  SIMEX and standard error estimation in semiparametric measurement error models.

Authors:  Tatiyana V Apanasovich; Raymond J Carroll; Arnab Maity
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 1.125

10.  Uncertainties in thyroid dose reconstruction after Chernobyl.

Authors:  I Likhtarev; V Minenko; V Khrouch; A Bouville
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.972

View more
  7 in total

1.  Estimation of radiation risk in presence of classical additive and Berkson multiplicative errors in exposure doses.

Authors:  S V Masiuk; S V Shklyar; A G Kukush; R J Carroll; L N Kovgan; I A Likhtarov
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Correcting for Measurement Error in Time-Varying Covariates in Marginal Structural Models.

Authors:  Ryan P Kyle; Erica E M Moodie; Marina B Klein; Michał Abrahamowicz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Simulation-extrapolation method to address errors in atomic bomb survivor dosimetry on solid cancer and leukaemia mortality risk estimates, 1950-2003.

Authors:  Rodrigue S Allodji; Boris Schwartz; Ibrahima Diallo; Césaire Agbovon; Dominique Laurier; Florent de Vathaire
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Expected estimating equation using calibration data for generalized linear models with a mixture of Berkson and classical errors in covariates.

Authors:  Jean de Dieu Tapsoba; Shen-Ming Lee; Ching-Yun Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 2-More complex methods of adjustment and advanced topics.

Authors:  Pamela A Shaw; Paul Gustafson; Raymond J Carroll; Veronika Deffner; Kevin W Dodd; Ruth H Keogh; Victor Kipnis; Janet A Tooze; Michael P Wallace; Helmut Küchenhoff; Laurence S Freedman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Thyroid cancer study among Ukrainian children exposed to radiation after the Chornobyl accident: improved estimates of the thyroid doses to the cohort members.

Authors:  Ilya Likhtarov; Lina Kovgan; Sergii Masiuk; Mykola Talerko; Mykola Chepurny; Olga Ivanova; Valentina Gerasymenko; Zulfira Boyko; Paul Voillequé; Vladimir Drozdovitch; André Bouville
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Impact of uncertainties in exposure assessment on estimates of thyroid cancer risk among Ukrainian children and adolescents exposed from the Chernobyl accident.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Alexander G Kukush; Sergii V Masiuk; Sergiy Shklyar; Raymond J Carroll; Jay H Lubin; Deukwoo Kwon; Alina V Brenner; Mykola D Tronko; Kiyohiko Mabuchi; Tetiana I Bogdanova; Maureen Hatch; Lydia B Zablotska; Valeriy P Tereshchenko; Evgenia Ostroumova; André C Bouville; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Mykola I Chepurny; Lina N Kovgan; Steven L Simon; Victor M Shpak; Ilya A Likhtarev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.