Literature DB >> 21422443

Reconstruction of nasal defects 1.5 cm or smaller.

Charles R Woodard1, Stephen S Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To review the repair of smaller nasal defects (≤1.5 cm) and their associated complications, elaborating on nasal obstruction and techniques to avoid it, and to determine outcomes with functional cartilage grafting.
METHODS: The medical records of patients requiring nasal reconstruction for Mohs defects 1.5 cm or smaller were reviewed. Variables analyzed included defect location, defect size, use of cartilage, flap design, smoking status, and postoperative complications (nasal obstruction and flap/graft necrosis).
RESULTS: A total of 208 patients with 213 nasal defects 1.5 cm or smaller were identified. The most common location was the alar subunit, followed by the tip, dorsum, and sidewall. Ninety-eight of the defects (46.0%) used cartilage grafts for reconstruction. Seventy-three of 84 alar defects (86.9%) were reconstructed with cartilage as a composite or batten graft. The sidewall and dorsum were the least likely to require cartilage grafting: 1 of 15 (6.7%) and 0 of 21, respectively. Ten patients (4.8%) had a postoperative complication: 6 of 19 smokers (31.6%) and 4 of 189 nonsmokers (2.1%). Overall, nasal obstruction was an infrequent complication (1.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of defect size, defect location, and flap design, smokers were at higher risk for postoperative complications. Subtle modifications in the classic flap design and liberal use of cartilage grafting reduce the risk of postoperative nasal obstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21422443     DOI: 10.1001/archfacial.2011.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 1521-2491


  7 in total

1.  Reconstruction of small soft tissue nasal defects.

Authors:  Erik M Wolfswinkel; William M Weathers; David Cheng; James F Thornton
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 2.  Reconstruction of nasal defects: contemporary approaches.

Authors:  Grace K Austin; William W Shockley
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Comparison of Outcomes of Early vs Delayed Graft Reconstruction of Mohs Micrographic Surgery Defects.

Authors:  Abel P David; Matthew Q Miller; Stephen S Park; J Jared Christophel
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.611

4.  Characterization of a migrative subpopulation of adult human nasoseptal chondrocytes with progenitor cell features and their potential for in vivo cartilage regeneration strategies.

Authors:  A F Elsaesser; S Schwarz; H Joos; L Koerber; R E Brenner; N Rotter
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 7.133

5.  Tailored Nasal Reconstruction after Dog-Bite Injury in a Young Woman.

Authors:  Milena Ferraro; Rosa Alessia Battista; Leone Giordano; Mario Bussi
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2020-04-14

6.  Association of Mohs Reconstructive Surgery Timing With Postoperative Complications.

Authors:  Matthew Q Miller; Abel P David; James E McLean; Stephen S Park; Jared Christophel
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.611

7.  Nasal Reconstruction of Post-Mohs Defects >1.5 cm in a Single Cosmetic Subunit Under Local Anesthesia by a Combination of Plastic Surgeon and Mohs Surgeon Team: A Cross-sectional Study and Review of Algorithmic Nasal Defect Closures.

Authors:  Omeed M Memar; Benjamin Caughlin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-06-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.