Literature DB >> 21422403

Accelerated approval of oncology products: the food and drug administration experience.

John R Johnson1, Yang-Min Ning, Ann Farrell, Robert Justice, Patricia Keegan, Richard Pazdur.   

Abstract

We reviewed the regulatory history of the accelerated approval process and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) experience with accelerated approval of oncology products from its initiation in December 11, 1992, to July 1, 2010. The accelerated approval regulations allowed accelerated approval of products to treat serious or life-threatening diseases based on surrogate endpoints that are reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. Failure to complete postapproval trials to confirm clinical benefit with due diligence could result in removal of the accelerated approval indication from the market. From December 11, 1992, to July 1, 2010, the FDA granted accelerated approval to 35 oncology products for 47 new indications. Clinical benefit was confirmed in postapproval trials for 26 of the 47 new indications, resulting in conversion to regular approval. The median time between accelerated approval and regular approval of oncology products was 3.9 years (range = 0.8-12.6 years) and the mean time was 4.7 years, representing a substantial time savings in terms of earlier availability of drugs to cancer patients. Three new indications did not show clinical benefit when confirmatory postapproval trials were completed and were subsequently removed from the market or had restricted distribution plans implemented. Confirmatory trials were not completed for 14 new indications. The five longest intervals from receipt of accelerated approval to July 1, 2010, without completion of trials to confirm clinical benefit were 10.5, 6.4, 5.5, 5.5, and 4.7 years. The five longest intervals between accelerated approval and successful conversion to regular approval were 12.6, 9.7, 8.1, 7.5, and 7.4 years. Trials to confirm clinical benefit should be part of the drug development plan and should be in progress at the time of an application seeking accelerated approval to prevent an ineffective drug from remaining on the market for an unacceptable time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21422403     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  60 in total

Review 1.  Role of randomized phase III trials in an era of effective targeted therapies.

Authors:  Manish R Sharma; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Moving molecular targeted drug therapy towards personalized medicine: issues related to clinical trial design.

Authors:  Jaap Verweij; Maja de Jonge; Ferry Eskens; Stefan Sleijfer
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  Seattle Genetics rare cancer drug sails through accelerated approval.

Authors:  Laura DeFrancesco
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  Neoadjuvant paradigm for accelerated drug development: an ideal model in bladder cancer.

Authors:  David D Chism; Michael E Woods; Matthew I Milowsky
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-07-24

5.  Postmarket safety of drugs approved by Health Canada on the basis of clinical and surrogate outcomes: a cohort study.

Authors:  Joel Lexchin; Tareq Ahmed
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-07-17

6.  Overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival with targeted and standard therapies in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: US Food and Drug Administration trial-level and patient-level analyses.

Authors:  Gideon M Blumenthal; Stella W Karuri; Hui Zhang; Lijun Zhang; Sean Khozin; Dickran Kazandjian; Shenghui Tang; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Patricia Keegan; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Benefit and harms of new anti-cancer drugs.

Authors:  Francisco E Vera-Badillo; Mustafa Al-Mubarak; Arnoud J Templeton; Eitan Amir
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 8.  Effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on wound healing and tissue repair: implications for surgery in cancer patients.

Authors:  Devron R Shah; Shamik Dholakia; Rashmi R Shah
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  Assessment of benefits and risks in development of targeted therapies for cancer--The view of regulatory authorities.

Authors:  Francesco Pignatti; Bertil Jonsson; Gideon Blumenthal; Robert Justice
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 10.  Beyond maximum grade: modernising the assessment and reporting of adverse events in haematological malignancies.

Authors:  Gita Thanarajasingam; Lori M Minasian; Frederic Baron; Franco Cavalli; R Angelo De Claro; Amylou C Dueck; Tarec C El-Galaly; Neil Everest; Jan Geissler; Christian Gisselbrecht; John Gribben; Mary Horowitz; S Percy Ivy; Caron A Jacobson; Armand Keating; Paul G Kluetz; Aviva Krauss; Yok Lam Kwong; Richard F Little; Francois-Xavier Mahon; Matthew J Matasar; María-Victoria Mateos; Kristen McCullough; Robert S Miller; Mohamad Mohty; Philippe Moreau; Lindsay M Morton; Sumimasa Nagai; Simon Rule; Jeff Sloan; Pieter Sonneveld; Carrie A Thompson; Kyriaki Tzogani; Flora E van Leeuwen; Galina Velikova; Diego Villa; John R Wingard; Sophie Wintrich; John F Seymour; Thomas M Habermann
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 18.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.