OBJECTIVE: To improve the proportion of men 50 years or older who conduct a thorough whole-body skin self-examination (SSE), because these men are at increased risk of being diagnosed as having thick melanomas and dying of melanoma. DESIGN: Randomized trial of a video-based intervention to increase whole-body SSE compared with brochures-only control. SETTING:Men from an Australian population register. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 930 men 50 years or older. INTERVENTION: The men were randomly assigned to receive either written materials only (control) or written materials along with a DVD or video and 2 postcard reminders (intervention). Telephone interviews were conducted at baseline and at 7 and 13 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The proportion of men who conducted a whole-body SSE with the help of 2 mirrors and/or a person to assist with difficult-to-see areas. RESULTS: Compared with baseline (10%), by 13 months both groups had increased their whole-body SSE behaviors similarly (36% intervention and 31% control) (P = .85). At 7 months, the intervention group was significantly more likely to examine at least 1 part of their back (P < .001) and to examine a greater number of body sites (P < .001). At 7 months, the proportion of men conducting any SSE increased by 28% in the intervention group compared with 13% in the control group (P < .001), but at 13 months, the prevalence of any self-examination (83% vs 80%) was again similar. CONCLUSION: While men 50 years or older are responsive to appropriately targeted intervention materials to increase their SSE behaviors, the addition of a video or DVD to written materials had only a transient advantage for optimal SSE practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: anzctr.org.au Identifier: 12608000384358.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To improve the proportion of men 50 years or older who conduct a thorough whole-body skin self-examination (SSE), because these men are at increased risk of being diagnosed as having thick melanomas and dying of melanoma. DESIGN: Randomized trial of a video-based intervention to increase whole-body SSE compared with brochures-only control. SETTING:Men from an Australian population register. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 930 men 50 years or older. INTERVENTION: The men were randomly assigned to receive either written materials only (control) or written materials along with a DVD or video and 2 postcard reminders (intervention). Telephone interviews were conducted at baseline and at 7 and 13 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The proportion of men who conducted a whole-body SSE with the help of 2 mirrors and/or a person to assist with difficult-to-see areas. RESULTS: Compared with baseline (10%), by 13 months both groups had increased their whole-body SSE behaviors similarly (36% intervention and 31% control) (P = .85). At 7 months, the intervention group was significantly more likely to examine at least 1 part of their back (P < .001) and to examine a greater number of body sites (P < .001). At 7 months, the proportion of men conducting any SSE increased by 28% in the intervention group compared with 13% in the control group (P < .001), but at 13 months, the prevalence of any self-examination (83% vs 80%) was again similar. CONCLUSION: While men 50 years or older are responsive to appropriately targeted intervention materials to increase their SSE behaviors, the addition of a video or DVD to written materials had only a transient advantage for optimal SSE practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: anzctr.org.au Identifier: 12608000384358.
Authors: Jerod L Stapleton; Rob Turrisi; Kimberly A Mallett; June K Robinson Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Mary K Tripp; Meg Watson; Sophie J Balk; Susan M Swetter; Jeffrey E Gershenwald Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Elliot J Coups; Sharon L Manne; Pamela Ohman Strickland; Michelle Hilgart; James S Goydos; Carolyn J Heckman; Paola Chamorro; Babar K Rao; Moira Davis; Franz O Smith; Frances P Thorndike; Lee M Ritterband Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: June K Robinson; Jeffrey D Wayne; Mary C Martini; Brittney A Hultgren; Kimberly A Mallett; Rob Turrisi Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Shannon M Campbell; Qiong Louie-Gao; Meghan L Hession; Elizabeth Bailey; Alan C Geller; Deborah Cummins Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Peter Murchie; Julia L Allan; William Brant; Matthew Dennis; Susan Hall; Judith Masthoff; Fiona M Walter; Marie Johnston Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-08-06 Impact factor: 2.692