Literature DB >> 21422297

Single-cell gene-expression profiling reveals qualitatively distinct CD8 T cells elicited by different gene-based vaccines.

Lukas Flatz1, Rahul Roychoudhuri, Mitsuo Honda, Abdelali Filali-Mouhim, Jean-Philippe Goulet, Nadia Kettaf, Min Lin, Mario Roederer, Elias K Haddad, Rafick P Sékaly, Gary J Nabel.   

Abstract

CD8 T cells play a key role in mediating protective immunity against selected pathogens after vaccination. Understanding the mechanism of this protection is dependent upon definition of the heterogeneity and complexity of cellular immune responses generated by different vaccines. Here, we identify previously unrecognized subsets of CD8 T cells based upon analysis of gene-expression patterns within single cells and show that they are differentially induced by different vaccines. Three prime-boost vector combinations encoding HIV Env stimulated antigen-specific CD8 T-cell populations of similar magnitude, phenotype, and functionality. Remarkably, however, analysis of single-cell gene-expression profiles enabled discrimination of a majority of central memory (CM) and effector memory (EM) CD8 T cells elicited by the three vaccines. Subsets of T cells could be defined based on their expression of Eomes, Cxcr3, and Ccr7, or Klrk1, Klrg1, and Ccr5 in CM and EM cells, respectively. Of CM cells elicited by DNA prime-recombinant adenoviral (rAd) boost vectors, 67% were Eomes(-) Ccr7(+) Cxcr3(-), in contrast to only 7% and 2% stimulated by rAd5-rAd5 or rAd-LCMV, respectively. Of EM cells elicited by DNA-rAd, 74% were Klrk1(-) Klrg1(-)Ccr5(-) compared with only 26% and 20% for rAd5-rAd5 or rAd5-LCMV. Definition by single-cell gene profiling of specific CM and EM CD8 T-cell subsets that are differentially induced by different gene-based vaccines will facilitate the design and evaluation of vaccines, as well as enable our understanding of mechanisms of protective immunity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21422297      PMCID: PMC3078363          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1013084108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  28 in total

1.  Modifications of the human immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein enhance immunogenicity for genetic immunization.

Authors:  Bimal K Chakrabarti; Wing-pui Kong; Bei-yue Wu; Zhi-Yong Yang; Jacques Friborg; Xu Ling; Steven R King; David C Montefiori; Gary J Nabel
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Preservation of functional virus-specific memory CD8+ T lymphocytes in vaccinated, simian human immunodeficiency virus-infected rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Paula M Acierno; Jörn E Schmitz; Darci A Gorgone; Yue Sun; Sampa Santra; Michael S Seaman; Michael H Newberg; John R Mascola; Gary J Nabel; Dennis Panicali; Norman L Letvin
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Multifunctional TH1 cells define a correlate of vaccine-mediated protection against Leishmania major.

Authors:  Patricia A Darrah; Dipti T Patel; Paula M De Luca; Ross W B Lindsay; Dylan F Davey; Barbara J Flynn; Søren T Hoff; Peter Andersen; Steven G Reed; Sheldon L Morris; Mario Roederer; Robert A Seder
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2007-06-10       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Enhancing efficacy of recombinant anticancer vaccines with prime/boost regimens that use two different vectors.

Authors:  K R Irvine; R S Chamberlain; E P Shulman; D R Surman; S A Rosenberg; N P Restifo
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-11-05       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Prime-boost immunization with adenoviral and modified vaccinia virus Ankara vectors enhances the durability and polyfunctionality of protective malaria CD8+ T-cell responses.

Authors:  Arturo Reyes-Sandoval; Tamara Berthoud; Nicola Alder; Loredana Siani; Sarah C Gilbert; Alfredo Nicosia; Stefano Colloca; Riccardo Cortese; Adrian V S Hill
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Immunogenicity of multiple gene and clade human immunodeficiency virus type 1 DNA vaccines.

Authors:  Wing-Pui Kong; Yue Huang; Zhi-Yong Yang; Bimal K Chakrabarti; Zoe Moodie; Gary J Nabel
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Different vaccine vectors delivering the same antigen elicit CD8+ T cell responses with distinct clonotype and epitope specificity.

Authors:  Mitsuo Honda; Rui Wang; Wing-Pui Kong; Masaru Kanekiyo; Wataru Akahata; Ling Xu; Kazuhiro Matsuo; Kannan Natarajan; Howard Robinson; Tedi E Asher; David A Price; Daniel C Douek; David H Margulies; Gary J Nabel
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Functional and genomic profiling of effector CD8 T cell subsets with distinct memory fates.

Authors:  Surojit Sarkar; Vandana Kalia; W Nicholas Haining; Bogumila T Konieczny; Shruti Subramaniam; Rafi Ahmed
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  The failed HIV Merck vaccine study: a step back or a launching point for future vaccine development?

Authors:  Rafick-Pierre Sekaly
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  44 in total

1.  Single-cell analysis: The deepest differences.

Authors:  Charlotte Schubert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Microfluidic single-cell real-time PCR for comparative analysis of gene expression patterns.

Authors:  Veronica Sanchez-Freire; Antje D Ebert; Tomer Kalisky; Stephen R Quake; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  The numerology of T cell functional diversity.

Authors:  W Nicholas Haining
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 31.745

4.  Mixture models for single-cell assays with applications to vaccine studies.

Authors:  Greg Finak; Andrew McDavid; Pratip Chattopadhyay; Maria Dominguez; Steve De Rosa; Mario Roederer; Raphael Gottardo
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 5.  Systems-level analysis of innate immunity.

Authors:  Daniel E Zak; Vincent C Tam; Alan Aderem
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 28.527

6.  HIV-1 Tat recruits transcription elongation factors dispersed along a flexible AFF4 scaffold.

Authors:  Seemay Chou; Heather Upton; Katherine Bao; Ursula Schulze-Gahmen; Avi J Samelson; Nanhai He; Anna Nowak; Huasong Lu; Nevan J Krogan; Qiang Zhou; Tom Alber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Sorting through subsets: which T-cell populations mediate highly effective adoptive immunotherapy?

Authors:  Christopher A Klebanoff; Luca Gattinoni; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  J Immunother       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.456

Review 8.  The dynamic lives of T cells: new approaches and themes.

Authors:  Yvonne J Yamanaka; Todd M Gierahn; J Christopher Love
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 16.687

9.  HIV immune activation drives increased Eomes expression in memory CD8 T cells in association with transcriptional downregulation of CD127.

Authors:  Rebecca B Hasley; Changwan Hong; Wenqing Li; Travis Friesen; Yoriko Nakamura; Grace Y Kim; Jung-Hyun Park; Julie A Hixon; Scott Durum; Zonghui Hu; Michael C Sneller; Raphael Oguariri; Tomozumi Imamichi; H Clifford Lane; Marta Catalfamo
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 10.  Heterogeneity in immune responses: from populations to single cells.

Authors:  Rahul Satija; Alex K Shalek
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 16.687

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.