BACKGROUND: When schizophrenia patients have insufficient response to clozapine, pharmacological augmentation is often applied. This meta-analysis summarizes available evidence on efficacy of pharmacological augmentation of clozapine treatment in schizophrenia spectrum disorder. METHODS: Only double-blind randomized controlled studies were included. Primary outcome measure was total symptom severity, and secondary outcome measures were subscores for positive and negative symptoms. Effect sizes were calculated from individual studies and combined to standardized mean differences (Hedges's g). RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies reporting on 15 different augmentations were included. Significant better efficacy than placebo on total symptom severity was observed for lamotrigine, citalopram, sulpiride, and CX516 (a glutamatergic agonist). The positive effect of lamotrigine disappeared after outlier removal. The other positive findings were based on single studies. Significantly better efficacy on positive symptom severity was observed for topiramate and sulpiride. The effect of topiramate disappeared after outlier removal. Results for sulpiride were based on a single randomized controlled trial. Citalopram, sulpiride, and CX516 showed better efficacy for negative symptoms than placebo, all based on single studies. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for efficacy of clozapine augmentation is currently scarce. Efficacy of lamotrigine and topiramate were both dependent on single studies with deviating findings. The effect of citalopram, sulpiride, and CX516 were based on single studies. Thus, despite their popularity, pharmacological augmentations of clozapine are not (yet) demonstrated to be superior to placebo.
BACKGROUND: When schizophreniapatients have insufficient response to clozapine, pharmacological augmentation is often applied. This meta-analysis summarizes available evidence on efficacy of pharmacological augmentation of clozapine treatment in schizophrenia spectrum disorder. METHODS: Only double-blind randomized controlled studies were included. Primary outcome measure was total symptom severity, and secondary outcome measures were subscores for positive and negative symptoms. Effect sizes were calculated from individual studies and combined to standardized mean differences (Hedges's g). RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies reporting on 15 different augmentations were included. Significant better efficacy than placebo on total symptom severity was observed for lamotrigine, citalopram, sulpiride, and CX516 (a glutamatergic agonist). The positive effect of lamotrigine disappeared after outlier removal. The other positive findings were based on single studies. Significantly better efficacy on positive symptom severity was observed for topiramate and sulpiride. The effect of topiramate disappeared after outlier removal. Results for sulpiride were based on a single randomized controlled trial. Citalopram, sulpiride, and CX516 showed better efficacy for negative symptoms than placebo, all based on single studies. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for efficacy of clozapine augmentation is currently scarce. Efficacy of lamotrigine and topiramate were both dependent on single studies with deviating findings. The effect of citalopram, sulpiride, and CX516 were based on single studies. Thus, despite their popularity, pharmacological augmentations of clozapine are not (yet) demonstrated to be superior to placebo.
Authors: William G Honer; Allen E Thornton; Eric Y H Chen; Raymond C K Chan; Jessica O Y Wong; Andrea Bergmann; Peter Falkai; Edith Pomarol-Clotet; Peter J McKenna; Emmanuel Stip; Richard Williams; G William MacEwan; Kishor Wasan; Ric Procyshyn Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-02-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Vassilis P Kontaxakis; Panayotis P Ferentinos; Beata J Havaki-Kontaxaki; Konstantinos G Paplos; Dimitra A Pappa; George N Christodoulou Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2006-08-08 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Oliver Freudenreich; David C Henderson; Jared P Walsh; Melissa A Culhane; Donald C Goff Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2007-02-23 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Shôn W Lewis; Thomas R E Barnes; Linda Davies; Robin M Murray; Graham Dunn; Karen P Hayhurst; Alison Markwick; Helen Lloyd; Peter B Jones Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2006-03-15 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Joseph P McEvoy; Jeffrey A Lieberman; T Scott Stroup; Sonia M Davis; Herbert Y Meltzer; Robert A Rosenheck; Marvin S Swartz; Diana O Perkins; Richard S E Keefe; Clarence E Davis; Joanne Severe; John K Hsiao Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 19.242
Authors: Iris E C Sommer; Christina W Slotema; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Eske M Derks; Jan Dirk Blom; Mark van der Gaag Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2012-02-24 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Shinichiro Nakajima; Hiroyoshi Takeuchi; Eric Plitman; Gagan Fervaha; Philip Gerretsen; Fernando Caravaggio; Jun Ku Chung; Yusuke Iwata; Gary Remington; Ariel Graff-Guerrero Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Brandon Abbs; Rashmin M Achalia; Adegoke O Adelufosi; Ahmet Yiğit Aktener; Natalie J Beveridge; Savita G Bhakta; Rachael K Blackman; Emre Bora; M S Byun; Maurice Cabanis; Ricardo Carrion; Christina A Castellani; Tze Jen Chow; M Dmitrzak-Weglarz; Charlotte Gayer-Anderson; Felipe V Gomes; Kristen Haut; Hiroaki Hori; Joshua T Kantrowitz; Taishiro Kishimoto; Frankie H F Lee; Ashleigh Lin; Lena Palaniyappan; Meina Quan; Maria D Rubio; Sonia Ruiz de Azúa; Saddichha Sahoo; Gregory P Strauss; Aleksandra Szczepankiewicz; Andrew D Thompson; Antonella Trotta; Laura M Tully; Hiroyuki Uchida; Eva Velthorst; Jared W Young; Anne O'Shea; Lynn E Delisi Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2012-08-19 Impact factor: 4.939