OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of atomoxetine for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in 5- and 6-year-old children. METHODS: This was an 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of atomoxetine in 101 children with ADHD. Atomoxetine or placebo was flexibly titrated to a maximum dose of 1.8 mg/kg per day. The pharmacotherapist reviewed psychoeducational material on ADHD and behavioral-management strategies with parents during each study visit. RESULTS: Significant mean decreases in parent (P = .009) and teacher (P = .02) ADHD-IV Rating Scale scores were demonstrated with atomoxetine compared with placebo. A total of 40% of children treated with atomoxetine met response criteria (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale indicating much or very much improved) compared with 22% of children on placebo, which was not significant (P = .1). Decreased appetite, gastrointestinal upset, and sedation were significantly more common with atomoxetine than placebo. Although some children demonstrated a robust response to atomoxetine, for others the response was more attenuated. Sixty-two percent of subjects who received atomoxetine were moderately, markedly, or severely ill according to the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale at study completion. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial of atomoxetine in children as young as 5 years. Atomoxetine generally was well tolerated and reduced core ADHD symptoms in the children on the basis of parent and teacher reports. Reductions in the ADHD-IV Rating Scale scores, however, did not necessarily translate to overall clinical and functional improvement, as demonstrated on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale. Despite benefits, the children in the atomoxetine group remained, on average, significantly impaired at the end of the study.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of atomoxetine for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in 5- and 6-year-old children. METHODS: This was an 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of atomoxetine in 101 children with ADHD. Atomoxetine or placebo was flexibly titrated to a maximum dose of 1.8 mg/kg per day. The pharmacotherapist reviewed psychoeducational material on ADHD and behavioral-management strategies with parents during each study visit. RESULTS: Significant mean decreases in parent (P = .009) and teacher (P = .02) ADHD-IV Rating Scale scores were demonstrated with atomoxetine compared with placebo. A total of 40% of children treated with atomoxetine met response criteria (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale indicating much or very much improved) compared with 22% of children on placebo, which was not significant (P = .1). Decreased appetite, gastrointestinal upset, and sedation were significantly more common with atomoxetine than placebo. Although some children demonstrated a robust response to atomoxetine, for others the response was more attenuated. Sixty-two percent of subjects who received atomoxetine were moderately, markedly, or severely ill according to the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale at study completion. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial of atomoxetine in children as young as 5 years. Atomoxetine generally was well tolerated and reduced core ADHD symptoms in the children on the basis of parent and teacher reports. Reductions in the ADHD-IV Rating Scale scores, however, did not necessarily translate to overall clinical and functional improvement, as demonstrated on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale. Despite benefits, the children in the atomoxetine group remained, on average, significantly impaired at the end of the study.
Authors: Mary Margaret Gleason; Helen Link Egger; Graham J Emslie; Laurence L Greenhill; Robert A Kowatch; Alicia F Lieberman; Joan L Luby; Judith Owens; Lawrence D Scahill; Michael S Scheeringa; Brian Stafford; Brian Wise; Charles H Zeanah Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: L L Greenhill; J M Swanson; B Vitiello; M Davies; W Clevenger; M Wu; L E Arnold; H B Abikoff; O G Bukstein; C K Conners; G R Elliott; L Hechtman; S P Hinshaw; B Hoza; P S Jensen; H C Kraemer; J S March; J H Newcorn; J B Severe; K Wells; T Wigal Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Christopher J Kratochvil; Timothy E Wilens; Laurence L Greenhill; Haitao Gao; Kurt D Baker; Peter D Feldman; Douglas L Gelowitz Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Kelly Posner; Glenn A Melvin; Desiree W Murray; S Sonia Gugga; Prudence Fisher; Anne Skrobala; Charles Cunningham; Benedetto Vitiello; Howard B Abikoff; Jaswinder K Ghuman; Scott Kollins; Sharon B Wigal; Tim Wigal; James T McCracken; James J McGough; Elizabeth Kastelic; Roy Boorady; Mark Davies; Shirley Z Chuang; James M Swanson; Mark A Riddle; Laurence L Greenhill Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Mark Wolraich; Lawrence Brown; Ronald T Brown; George DuPaul; Marian Earls; Heidi M Feldman; Theodore G Ganiats; Beth Kaplanek; Bruce Meyer; James Perrin; Karen Pierce; Michael Reiff; Martin T Stein; Susanna Visser Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2011-10-16 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Shannon G Panther; Alice M Knotts; Tamara Odom-Maryon; Kenneth Daratha; Teri Woo; Tracy A Klein Journal: J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther Date: 2017 Nov-Dec
Authors: Mark L Wolraich; Joseph F Hagan; Carla Allan; Eugenia Chan; Dale Davison; Marian Earls; Steven W Evans; Susan K Flinn; Tanya Froehlich; Jennifer Frost; Joseph R Holbrook; Christoph Ulrich Lehmann; Herschel Robert Lessin; Kymika Okechukwu; Karen L Pierce; Jonathan D Winner; William Zurhellen Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Melissa L Danielson; Susanna N Visser; Mary Margaret Gleason; Georgina Peacock; Angelika H Claussen; Stephen J Blumberg Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 2.225